Teams

JVoci/DShealy (FCC)

2024 Singles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Singles 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-07-15vs TMiller (Park Road)Won 10
W#3 SinglesDanielle Shealy vs Elizabeth Frederick6-3, 6-1
2024-07-08vs TMiller (Park Road)Won 10
W#1 SinglesCaroline Lattanzi vs Reshma Vora6-4, 6-3
2024-07-01vs TMiller (Park Road)Won 10
W#3 SinglesTARA RAND vs Jessica Salzman6-3, 6-1
2024-06-24vs TMiller (Park Road)Won 20
W#1 SinglesJennifer Pollino vs Serena Kossisyan-Perlman7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesJennifer Voci vs Tonya Miller7-6, 6-1
2024-06-17vs TMiller (Park Road)Won 20
W#1 SinglesDanielle Shealy vs Janelle Sonmor6-1, 7-5
W#2 SinglesJennifer Voci vs Jessica Salzman6-2, 6-1
2024-06-10vs TMiller (Park Road)Won 10
W#1 SinglesCaroline Lattanzi vs Janelle Sonmor6-0, 6-1
2024-06-03vs TMiller (Park Road)Won 20
W#1 SinglesTARA RAND vs Reshma Vora6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesJennifer Pollino vs Serena Kossisyan-Perlman6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
TARA RAND
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
2.98
Caroline Lattanzi
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.87
Diane Hegele
published 3
2.87
Jennifer Voci
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
2.86
Wendy Hall
published
2.81
Danielle Shealy
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
2.79
Jennifer Pollino
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Danielle Shealy + TARA RAND5358% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Voci + TARA RAND5355% gamesnot enough data
Danielle Shealy + Jennifer Voci3249% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Pollino + Caroline Lattanzi134 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Voci + Caroline Lattanzi123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
TARA RAND
86W–59L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Caroline Lattanzi
54W–39L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%54%46%
2.98
3
Diane Hegele
7W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%18%
2.87
3
Jennifer Voci
96W–62L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
2.87
Wendy Hall
12W–8L career · no lines in 2024
0%1%99%
2.86
3
Danielle Shealy
91W–90L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Jennifer Pollino
83W–86L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.79

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.