Teams

2.5 Terminetters

2024 Washington D.C. Singles · Washington D.C. Singles 2.5 Men

4 players · average NTRP 2.83 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-08-25vs DC SuperstarsWon 10
W#1 SinglesEDWARD CHATTERS vs Christopher Walker6-4, 6-3
2024-08-18vs DC SuperstarsLost 02
L#1 SinglesEric Ritz vs Isaac Toyos4-6, 3-4
L#2 SinglesKirk Wilkerson vs Han Dong5-7, 1-2
2024-08-11vs DC SuperstarsLost 02
L#1 SinglesEric Ritz vs Han Dong6-7, 1-3
L#2 SinglesKirk Wilkerson vs Christopher Walker6-7, 1-2
2024-08-04vs DC SuperstarsSplit 11
W#1 SinglesEric Ritz vs Daniel Kaufman6-3, 4-5
L#2 SinglesKirk Wilkerson vs Han Dong2-6, 3-6
2024-07-28vs DC SuperstarsLost 12
L#1 SinglesEDWARD CHATTERS vs Isaac Toyos1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesEric Ritz vs Christopher Walker2-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesKirk Wilkerson vs Daniel Kaufman7-6, 1-0
2024-07-21vs DC SuperstarsLost 02
L#1 SinglesEric Ritz vs Isaac Toyos4-6, 3-2
L#2 SinglesKirk Wilkerson vs Han Dong2-6, 4-1
2024-07-14vs DC SuperstarsSplit 11
L#1 SinglesEDWARD CHATTERS vs Isaac Toyos2-6, 4-5
W#2 SinglesKirk Wilkerson vs Daniel Kaufman6-4, 1-2
2024-07-07vs DC SuperstarsWon 30
W#1 SinglesEric Ritz vs Christopher Walker6-7, 5-0
W#2 SinglesEDWARD CHATTERS vs Han Dong6-4, 6-1
W#3 SinglesKirk Wilkerson vs Daniel Kaufman6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Washington D.C. Singles 2.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1DC Superstars08131121181
22.5 Terminetters0891531199

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.58 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.79
Desmond LaMar
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
2.56
EDWARD CHATTERS
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.51
Eric Ritz
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 2.5
2.45
Kirk Wilkerson
usually #2 Singles 71%, also #3 Singles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

EDWARD CHATTERS + Eric Ritz033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Desmond LaMar
101W–129L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%93%5%
2.79
3
EDWARD CHATTERS
21W–56L career · 4 lines in 2024
32%67%<1%
2.56
2.5
Eric Ritz
9W–25L career · 6 lines in 2024
0%46%54%
2.51
Kirk Wilkerson
15W–19L career · 7 lines in 2024
64%36%<1%
2.45

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.