Teams

DC Superstars

2024 Washington D.C. Singles · Washington D.C. Singles 2.5 Men

4 players · average NTRP 2.75 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-08-25vs 2.5 TerminettersLost 01
L#1 SinglesChristopher Walker vs EDWARD CHATTERS4-6, 3-6
2024-08-18vs 2.5 TerminettersWon 20
W#1 SinglesIsaac Toyos vs Eric Ritz6-4, 4-3
W#2 SinglesHan Dong vs Kirk Wilkerson7-5, 2-1
2024-08-11vs 2.5 TerminettersWon 30
W#1 SinglesHan Dong vs Eric Ritz7-6, 3-1
W#2 SinglesChristopher Walker vs Kirk Wilkerson7-6, 2-1
W#3 SinglesIsaac Toyos vs Stephen Siegel6-0, 6-1
2024-08-04vs 2.5 TerminettersSplit 11
L#1 SinglesDaniel Kaufman vs Eric Ritz3-6, 5-4
W#2 SinglesHan Dong vs Kirk Wilkerson6-2, 6-3
2024-07-28vs 2.5 TerminettersWon 21
W#1 SinglesIsaac Toyos vs EDWARD CHATTERS6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesChristopher Walker vs Eric Ritz6-2, 6-1
L#3 SinglesDaniel Kaufman vs Kirk Wilkerson6-7, 0-1
2024-07-21vs 2.5 TerminettersWon 30
W#1 SinglesIsaac Toyos vs Eric Ritz6-4, 2-3
W#2 SinglesHan Dong vs Kirk Wilkerson6-2, 1-4
W#3 SinglesChristopher Walker vs Stephen Siegel6-2, 4-1
2024-07-14vs 2.5 TerminettersWon 21
W#1 SinglesIsaac Toyos vs EDWARD CHATTERS6-2, 5-4
L#2 SinglesDaniel Kaufman vs Kirk Wilkerson4-6, 2-1
W#3 SinglesHan Dong vs Stephen Siegel6-0, 6-0
2024-07-07vs 2.5 TerminettersLost 03
L#1 SinglesChristopher Walker vs Eric Ritz7-6, 0-5
L#2 SinglesHan Dong vs EDWARD CHATTERS4-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesDaniel Kaufman vs Kirk Wilkerson0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Washington D.C. Singles 2.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1DC Superstars08131121181
22.5 Terminetters0891531199

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Han Dong
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3
Isaac Toyos
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 3
Christopher Walker
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 2.5
Daniel Kaufman
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 2.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Han Dong
5W–1L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Isaac Toyos
9W–2L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
2.5
Christopher Walker
10W–6L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
2.5
Daniel Kaufman
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.