Teams

NJ YELLOW

2026 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-21vs BCC NAVYWon 21
W#1 DoublesMadison Fortunato / Alexandra Wingert vs Katherine Beeck / Becky Fase6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesTerming Chew vs Victoria McCarthy6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLauren Rivas / Michelle Halliday vs Jung Lindas / Chiara Clark3-6, 6-7
2026-08-18vs BRMST NAVYSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTerming Chew / Madison Fortunato vs Hillary Riley / Michelle Schulz7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMichelle Halliday / Becky Bell vs Noelle Anthony / Kathy Schmidt4-6, 1-6
2026-08-04vs LTA-Q SILVERWon 21
W#1 DoublesAlexandra Wingert / Madison Fortunato vs Christina Finkel / Cara Hoving4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesTerming Chew vs Ronnie Meyers5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSusan Bolton / Michelle Halliday vs Adele Reester / Pauline Lahey2-6, 0-6
2026-07-28vs CVTA PURPLELost 12
L#1 DoublesSusan Bolton / Madison Fortunato vs Jennifer Ufland / Emily Marty6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAlexandra Wingert vs Lauren Benson2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBecky Bell / Michelle Halliday vs Catriona Murray / Alycia Murray6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2026-07-21vs NJ GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesLauren Rivas / Madison Fortunato vs Josiane Broussard / Mallory Karr6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTerming Chew vs Nikki Allegretto4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMichelle Halliday / Becky Bell vs Colleen McClary / Rebecca Strobel6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Terming Chew
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.81
Alexandra Wingert
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.80
Madison Fortunato
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Lauren Rivas
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.49
Michelle Halliday
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.48
Becky Bell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.36
Susan Bolton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alexandra Wingert + Madison Fortunato7264% games+7.6% vs expected
Lauren Rivas + Susan Bolton224 matchesnot enough data
Becky Bell + Michelle Halliday123 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Halliday + Lauren Rivas033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Terming Chew
90W–78L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Alexandra Wingert
69W–43L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Madison Fortunato
38W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.80
Lauren Rivas
84W–43L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Michelle Halliday
68W–55L career · 5 lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
3.49
4
Becky Bell
58W–29L career · 3 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
3.48
Susan Bolton
63W–68L career · 2 lines in 2026
86%14%<1%
3.36

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.