Teams

BRMST NAVY

2026 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-25vs BCC NAVYLost 03
L#1 DoublesNoelle Anthony / Claudia Booton vs Becky Fase / Katherine Beeck3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesCourtney Chan vs Sarah Estrella6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKathy Schmidt / Kristin Holmquist vs Brooke Harrison / Chiara Clark1-6, 2-6
2026-08-18vs NJ YELLOWSplit 11
L#1 DoublesHillary Riley / Michelle Schulz vs Terming Chew / Madison Fortunato5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesNoelle Anthony / Kathy Schmidt vs Michelle Halliday / Becky Bell6-4, 6-1
2026-08-11vs LTA-Q SILVERWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichelle Schulz / Noelle Anthony vs Tess Wright / Christine Bonthius6-3, 7-6
W#1 SinglesCourtney Chan vs Carolyn McAllister6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesHillary Riley / Claudia Booton vs Adele Reester / Alexandra Sufrin7-5, 1-6, 0-1
2026-08-04vs CVTA PURPLELost 12
W#1 DoublesLissa Moon / Michelle Schulz vs Emily O'keefe / Heidi Warriner7-5, 6-4
L#1 SinglesCourtney Chan vs Emily Marty4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMorgan Arvisais / Claudia Booton vs Catriona Murray / Alycia Murray6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2026-07-28vs NJ GREENWon 20
W#1 DoublesHillary Riley / Morgan Arvisais vs Mallory Karr / Nikki Allegretto6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNoelle Anthony / Kristin Holmquist vs Rebecca Strobel / Colleen McClary6-0, 6-2
2026-07-21vs BCC NAVYLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichelle Schulz / Hillary Riley vs Regan Ebert / Kathy Caruso7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesCourtney Chan vs Victoria McCarthy6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKathy Schmidt / Kristin Holmquist vs Chiara Clark / Jung Lindas2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Courtney Chan
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.76
Lissa Moon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Noelle Anthony
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.72
Hillary Riley
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.71
Michelle Schulz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Morgan Arvisais
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.51
Kathy Schmidt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Claudia Booton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.38
Kristin Holmquist
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hillary Riley + Morgan Arvisais13653% games−4.3% vs expected
Claudia Booton + Morgan Arvisais033 matchesnot enough data
Noelle Anthony + Michelle Schulz213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Courtney Chan
8W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
Lissa Moon
32W–26L career · 1 line in 2026
3%92%4%
3.76
Noelle Anthony
20W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.75
4
Hillary Riley
69W–65L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
Michelle Schulz
22W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Morgan Arvisais
50W–48L career · 2 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.54
Kathy Schmidt
8W–27L career · 3 lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
3.51
4
Claudia Booton
72W–137L career · 3 lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
3.47
4
Kristin Holmquist
45W–53L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
3.38

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.