Teams

WS Dellovade 4

2026 Alachua Adult 18 & Over Winter · 4.0 W Thur

13 players · average NTRP 3.88 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-06vs DB CrawfordLost 13
W#1 DoublesKim Magee / Madison Sagas vs Tracey Bryant / Rhoda Wilburn7-6, 7-6
L#1 SinglesAlison Andrus vs Wheeler Crawford1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCaroli Harkness / Margot Maurer vs Caroline Hord / Heather Gibson4-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesTiffany Scalf vs Elizabeth Dickerson0-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-04-02vs Alachua/VanZylLost 23
L#1 DoublesSarah Hooghuis / Tiffany Scalf vs Alyssa Ray / Elize VanZyl1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesAlison Andrus vs Kannika Torres6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesKim Magee / Madison Sagas vs Anita Rajasekhar / Jenny Neelands6-4, 6-3
L#2 SinglesMargot Maurer vs Sitara Sriram1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCaroli Harkness / Peggi Bockman vs Tammy Miller / Julie Sager2-6, 0-6
2026-03-27vs Alachua/VanZylWon 31
W#1 DoublesCaroli Harkness / Peggi Bockman vs Christine Padron / Samantha Penhale6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMadison Sagas vs Lauren Stevenson6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKim Magee / Amanda Miller vs Jenny Neelands / Tammy Miller1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAlison Andrus vs Elize VanZyl7-6, 0-6, 0-1
2026-03-21vs Alachua/VanZylSplit 22
L#1 DoublesLisa Steed / Amanda Miller vs Anita Rajasekhar / Samantha Penhale4-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesMadison Sagas vs Kannika Torres6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKim Magee / Caroli Harkness vs Elize VanZyl / Tanner Watts1-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesTiffany Scalf vs Susannah Peddie6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2026-03-12vs DB CrawfordLost 13
L#1 DoublesMargot Maurer / Sarah Hooghuis vs Wheeler Crawford / Elizabeth Dickerson3-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesMadison Sagas vs Mara Rodriguez6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAllison Shinn / Tiffany Scalf vs TARA BROMIRSKI / Caroline Hord2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKim Magee / Taiana Mendez vs Tracey Bryant / Cristi Dobbs2-6, 1-6
2026-02-21vs DB CrawfordLost 14
L#1 DoublesKim Magee / Alison Andrus vs Wheeler Crawford / Shannon Reintgen3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesMadison Sagas vs Elizabeth Dickerson6-0, 7-5
L#2 DoublesSarah Hooghuis / Caroli Harkness vs Rhoda Wilburn / Jordan Davis6-1, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesMargot Maurer vs Lauren Indelicato0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTaiana Mendez / Allison Shinn vs Polina Zasimovich / Tracey Bryant3-6, 3-6
2026-02-07vs Alachua/VanZylLost 03
L#1 DoublesAllison Shinn / Kim Magee vs Elize VanZyl / Tanner Watts2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAbigail Dellovade / Caroli Harkness vs Samantha Penhale / Christine Padron5-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesTaiana Mendez / Margot Maurer vs Jennifer Hitchcock / Megan Ryals4-6, 1-6
2026-01-31vs DB CrawfordLost 23
W#1 DoublesKim Magee / Caroli Harkness vs TARA BROMIRSKI / Maria Curatolo7-5, 6-4
L#1 SinglesAbigail Dellovade vs Jordan Davis2-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSarah Hooghuis / Taiana Mendez vs Caroline Hord / Cristi Dobbs3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 SinglesAlison Andrus vs Polina Zasimovich7-5, 7-6
L#3 DoublesMadison Sagas / Tiffany Scalf vs Wheeler Crawford / Elizabeth Dickerson1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 W Thur have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Madison Sagas
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.84
Alison Andrus
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 4
3.76
Abigail Dellovade
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Cynthia Thibault
published 4
3.74
Caroli Harkness
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.61
Lisa Steed
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
Tiffany Scalf
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
3.54
Taiana Mendez
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.52
Kim Magee
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.46
Allison Shinn
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.38
Sarah Hooghuis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.19
Margot Maurer
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Peggi Bockman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alison Andrus + Kim Magee1537% games−9.2% vs expected
Peggi Bockman + Alison Andrus4352% gamesnot enough data
Madison Sagas + Abigail Dellovade6071% gamesnot enough data
Peggi Bockman + Taiana Mendez5064% gamesnot enough data
Alison Andrus + Madison Sagas5066% gamesnot enough data
Sarah Hooghuis + Tiffany Scalf314 matchesnot enough data
Taiana Mendez + Alison Andrus123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Madison Sagas
47W–11L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
4.01
4
Alison Andrus
79W–67L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.84
4
Abigail Dellovade
137W–49L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.76
4
Cynthia Thibault
6W–9L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Caroli Harkness
2W–5L career · type S · 7 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.74
Lisa Steed
15W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
22%77%<1%
3.61
Tiffany Scalf
8W–6L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%35%65%
3.56
Taiana Mendez
23W–37L career · 4 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.54
Kim Magee
10W–13L career · 8 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.52
4
Allison Shinn
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
62%38%<1%
3.46
3.5
Sarah Hooghuis
53W–32L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.38
3.5
Margot Maurer
51W–79L career · 9 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
Peggi Bockman
30W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.