Teams

WP NAVY

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT

9 players · average NTRP 2.75 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-09-05vs SKY REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesKaty Massanari / Libby Malone vs Christine Atkinson / Camilla Almuti6-0, 3-6, 0-1
2024-08-26vs DTC BLUELost 01
L#2 DoublesAlexia Eslan / Libby Malone vs Kelli Barton / Evelyn Price1-6, 2-6
2024-08-19vs CACM GREENSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKaty Massanari / Kelly Kurtz vs Shanna Weber / Ellie Carothers Kelly7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAlexia Eslan / Caitlin Whitham vs Sarah Payne / Beth Bean4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-08-12vs DTP ORANGELost 01
L#2 DoublesAlexia Eslan / Libby Malone vs Meredith Giske / Kim Weeks1-6, 3-6
2024-08-05vs CACM BLUESplit 11
W#1 SinglesKaty Massanari vs Sheryl Chandler6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCaitlin Whitham / Alexia Eslan vs Kristine Strayer / Neda Rasouli1-6, 3-6
2024-07-22vs GPTC NAVYLost 01
L#2 DoublesLaurie Wagner / Terre Buckley vs Molly Holland / Amy Parent3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Marissa Ogden
published
3.17
Kelly Kurtz
published
2.81
Katy Massanari
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.63
Alexia Eslan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.55
Laurie Wagner
published
2.52
Libby Malone
published
2.46
Theresa Wheeler
published
Caitlin Whitham
published 2.5
Terre Buckley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Theresa Wheeler + Katy Massanari4454% games+0.9% vs expected
Terre Buckley + Katy Massanari134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marissa Ogden
15W–4L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%2%
3.22
Kelly Kurtz
28W–13L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
3
Katy Massanari
31W–30L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%90%8%
2.81
3
Alexia Eslan
47W–45L career · 4 lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
2.63
Laurie Wagner
4W–12L career · no lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
2.55
Libby Malone
8W–8L career · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
2.52
Theresa Wheeler
10W–14L career · no lines in 2024
60%40%<1%
2.46
2.5
Caitlin Whitham
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
2.5
Terre Buckley
22W–69L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.