Teams

CACM GREEN

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT

7 players · average NTRP 3.20 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-09-11vs CACM BLUEWon 20
W#1 SinglesAUSRA MOLLERUD vs Neda Rasouli3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSarah Payne / Ellie Carothers Kelly vs Sheryl Chandler / Lauren Barkley7-6, 0-6, 1-0
2024-08-26vs CM GOLDWon 20
W#1 SinglesShanna Weber vs Laurie Korneffel1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEllie Carothers Kelly / Sarah Payne vs Jennifer Malen / Alison Thompson6-3, 6-3
2024-08-19vs WP NAVYSplit 11
L#1 DoublesShanna Weber / Ellie Carothers Kelly vs Katy Massanari / Kelly Kurtz6-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesAUSRA MOLLERUD vs Marissa Ogden6-0, 6-2
2024-08-12vs SKY REDWon 10
W#1 SinglesAUSRA MOLLERUD vs Joelle Klein6-2, 6-4
2024-08-05vs DTC BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesCatherine Kraft / AUSRA MOLLERUD vs Elizabeth Sipes / Elisabeth Vezzani6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEllie Carothers Kelly / Beth Bean vs Jennifer Parsons / Jill Stein6-4, 6-3
2024-07-29vs GPTC NAVYSplit 11
W#1 SinglesAUSRA MOLLERUD vs Jackie Coppola6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSarah Payne / Shanna Weber vs Wendy Berhman / Amy Parent4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-07-22vs DTP ORANGELost 02
L#1 DoublesCatherine Kraft / AUSRA MOLLERUD vs Rebecca Glatz / Nghi Hoang3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesShanna Weber vs Emma Tiernon1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
AUSRA MOLLERUD
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Ellie Carothers Kelly
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.90
Catherine Kraft
published 3
2.83
Willa FAWER
published
2.82
Shanna Weber
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.66
Maya Pingle Trinen
published
2.64
Beth Bean
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maya Pingle Trinen + Beth Bean2644% games−9.6% vs expected
Shanna Weber + Maya Pingle Trinen033 matchesnot enough data
Shanna Weber + AUSRA MOLLERUD123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
AUSRA MOLLERUD
69W–36L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Ellie Carothers Kelly
31W–26L career · type A · 4 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.21
3
Catherine Kraft
17W–24L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
2.90
Willa FAWER
29W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Shanna Weber
34W–53L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82
Maya Pingle Trinen
14W–14L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
2.66
3
Beth Bean
8W–17L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%1%
2.64

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.