Teams

MILLS COLLEGE 40AW3.0A

2023 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 3.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Ada Palotai
published 3.5
3.31
Vicki Wong
published
3.28
Tammy Nikoltcheva
published
3.23
Sarah McElhinney
published
2.91
Gabriela Aranda
published 3
2.90
Lori Belhumeur
published
2.85
Nancy Boswell
published
2.85
Olga Keselman
published
2.83
Serena Zanello
published
2.81
Lana Rak
published 3
2.71
Lynne Harrington
published
2.69
Angela Heath
published 3
2.67
Cora Luber
published 3
2.62
Laura Sumrall
published
2.30
Leila Zokaei
published
Rochelle Dineen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gabriela Aranda + Laura Sumrall303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ada Palotai
16W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
3.43
Vicki Wong
14W–15L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.31
Tammy Nikoltcheva
7W–9L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.28
Sarah McElhinney
11W–10L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
3
Gabriela Aranda
20W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
2.91
Lori Belhumeur
14W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
2.90
Nancy Boswell
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
2.85
Olga Keselman
10W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%12%
2.85
Serena Zanello
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.83
3
Lana Rak
57W–46L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
2.81
Lynne Harrington
7W–13L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
2.71
3
Angela Heath
3W–12L career · no lines in 2023
8%92%1%
2.69
3
Cora Luber
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
10%90%1%
2.67
Laura Sumrall
6W–2L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
2.62
Leila Zokaei
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
94%6%<1%
2.30
Rochelle Dineen
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.