Teams

CVTA BLUE

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER

15 players · average NTRP 4.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-30vs RCC ORANGEWon 21
W#1 DoublesAndrew Schifle / Pranav Barve vs Scott Gorrell / Alex Getlan6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesBrian DeCorte vs Sam Granberry6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPaul Kolachov / AJ Johnson vs Matthew Palmer / Jonathan Hoke6-4, 6-2
2024-05-23vs NJ TEALLost 12
W#1 DoublesAndrew Schifle / AJ Johnson vs Matthew Hooper / Clint Jones6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesAndy Antos / Trevor Updegraff vs Jake Mendel / Meng Lian4-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesConnor Ohlsen vs Garrett Klumpar6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-05-16vs TTA REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesPranav Barve / Matt Miller vs Anthony Garcia / George Burton7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesEric Maier / Paul Kolachov vs Ian Harris / Philip Dixon-Patterson4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTrevor Updegraff / Brodik Howe vs Marcel de Graaf / Eric Jaggers3-6, 3-6
2024-05-09vs RMTC BLUELost 12
W#1 DoublesAndrew Schifle / Andy Antos vs Greg Mionske / John Doe6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesBrian DeCorte vs Luke Steiner4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesPaul Kolachov / Horatio Nelson vs Kevin Godzik / Louis Amundson2-6, 0-6
2024-05-05vs LTA-Q BLACKWon 30
W#1 DoublesKeaton Howe / Pranav Barve vs David Riffel / Marco Scalise6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesConnor Ohlsen vs Jonathan Lumpkin6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesEric Maier / Horatio Nelson vs Jon Garich / Jordan Stauder6-2, 6-4
2024-05-02vs MEA PURPLEWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrian DeCorte / Matt Miller vs David Jansen / Steve Sims6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesConnor Ohlsen vs Noah Bodner6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesPaul Kolachov / Peter Fitzgerald vs David Cohen / James Bray6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-04-25vs MEA NAVYWon 30
W#1 SinglesConnor Ohlsen vs Brad Michalchuk6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesBrian DeCorte vs Patrick Sprowls6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKeaton Howe / Paul Kolachov vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.29 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.51
Eric Maier
published
4.50
Connor Ohlsen
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.47
Peter Fitzgerald
published
4.42
AJ Johnson
published 4.5
4.42
Andrew Schifle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.40
Connor Buchanan
published 5
4.35
Paul Kolachov
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.30
Pranav Barve
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Andy Antos
published 4.5
4.24
Brian DeCorte
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.21
Trevor Updegraff
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.17
Rocky Nelson
published
4.16
Keaton Howe
published 4.5
4.04
Brian Carlson
published 4.5
3.89
Horatio Nelson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paul Kolachov + Eric Maier6068% games+12.4% vs expected
Eric Maier + Peter Fitzgerald9072% games+9.3% vs expected
Pranav Barve + Keaton Howe2342% gamesnot enough data
Trevor Updegraff + Keaton Howe134 matchesnot enough data
Connor Ohlsen + Paul Kolachov404 matchesnot enough data
Pranav Barve + Andrew Schifle314 matchesnot enough data
AJ Johnson + Peter Fitzgerald314 matchesnot enough data
Paul Kolachov + AJ Johnson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Eric Maier
33W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
4.51
4.5
Connor Ohlsen
66W–19L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%50%50%
4.50
Peter Fitzgerald
24W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
4.47
4.5
AJ Johnson
21W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
4.42
4.5
Andrew Schifle
37W–10L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
4.42
5
Connor Buchanan
9W–4L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.40
4.5
Paul Kolachov
44W–24L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%85%15%
4.35
4.5
Pranav Barve
24W–20L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%90%8%
4.30
4.5
Andy Antos
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Brian DeCorte
58W–26L career · 4 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
4.24
4.5
Trevor Updegraff
45W–48L career · 2 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
4.21
Rocky Nelson
6W–7L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
4.17
4.5
Keaton Howe
35W–60L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%1%
4.16
4.5
Brian Carlson
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
4.04
4
Horatio Nelson
24W–22L career · type A · 2 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.89

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.