Teams

NJ TEAL

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 4.58 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-30vs LTA-Q BLACKWon 31
W#1 DoublesClint Jones / Matthew Hooper vs Clayton McLaughlin / Jon Garich6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDennis Dozon / Jake Mendel vs Gregg Sommer / Andrew Grolnick6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesNick Law vs Jonathan Lumpkin2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesTim Jenkins / Meng Lian vs Idi Omar / Jordan Stauder6-4, 6-3
2024-05-23vs CVTA BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesMatthew Hooper / Clint Jones vs Andrew Schifle / AJ Johnson4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesJake Mendel / Meng Lian vs Andy Antos / Trevor Updegraff6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesGarrett Klumpar vs Connor Ohlsen6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAdam Knox / Luke Snyder vs Matt Miller / Rocky Nelson3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-05-16vs RMTC BLUELost 13
W#1 DoublesAdam Knox / Luke Snyder vs Joshua Harrison / Juan Vial6-3, 7-6
L#1 SinglesYanno Fernandez vs Luke Steiner2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDennis Dozon / Mateo Barroetavena vs Kevin Godzik / Louis Amundson6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMatthew Hooper / Clint Jones vs Spencer Bouck / Doug Kazarosian2-6, 2-6
2024-05-09vs MEA NAVYWon 31
W#1 DoublesMateo Barroetavena / Garrett Klumpar vs Mark Buzek / Curt Corrigan6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMatthew Hooper / Clint Jones vs Matt Schwartz / Andrew Smith6-1, 6-2
L#2 SinglesTim Jenkins vs Brad Michalchuk6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesNick Law / Adam Knox vs Rich Weintraub / Bruce Wiener6-3, 7-6
2024-05-02vs RCC ORANGEWon 31
W#1 DoublesDennis Dozon / Luke Snyder vs Christopher Johnson / Alex Pedersen4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAdam Knox / Mateo Barroetavena vs Andrew Hefter / Ken Shyu7-6, 6-3
W#2 SinglesYanno Fernandez vs Tristan Burm6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesMeng Lian / Jake Mendel vs Travis LaBerge / Alex Getlan4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2024-04-25vs TTA REDWon 40
W#1 DoublesDennis Dozon / Mateo Barroetavena vs Ricardo Rodriguez / Eric Jaggers6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMatthew Hooper / Clint Jones vs Philip Dixon-Patterson / Ian Harris6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesGarrett Klumpar vs Chad Northey6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLuke Snyder / Yanno Fernandez vs Anthony Garcia / Dylan Griffin6-4, 6-3
2024-04-18vs MEA PURPLEWon 40
W#1 DoublesDennis Dozon / Mateo Barroetavena vs David Jansen / Michael Winters6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesClint Jones / Jake Mendel vs Bob Litwin / Luis Garza6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesGarrett Klumpar vs Rex Vedder7-5, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTim Jenkins / Meng Lian vs Andy James / Steve Bennett6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.19 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Garrett Klumpar
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 5
4.38
Matthew Hooper
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
4.27
Dennis Dozon
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.27
Meng Lian
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
Adam Knox
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.23
Jake Mendel
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.11
Clint Jones
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.10
Nick Law
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.98
Tim Jenkins
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Luke Snyder
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Mateo Barroetavena
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Yanno Fernandez
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matthew Hooper + Clint Jones17756% games+5.3% vs expected
Mateo Barroetavena + Dennis Dozon314 matchesnot enough data
Adam Knox + Luke Snyder123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Garrett Klumpar
9W–3L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Matthew Hooper
88W–36L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
4.38
4.5
Dennis Dozon
66W–15L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Meng Lian
102W–63L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Adam Knox
28W–10L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Jake Mendel
21W–7L career · 4 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
Clint Jones
41W–29L career · 6 lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
4.11
Nick Law
6W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
4.10
Tim Jenkins
6W–5L career · 3 lines in 2024
56%44%<1%
3.98
Luke Snyder
16W–3L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mateo Barroetavena
11W–14L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Yanno Fernandez
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.