Teams

OVP Dean L-1 Team 1

2026 COTA Mixed Tri-level Winter 2025 (non-advancing) · Flight I-6.5, 6.0, 5.5

15 players · average NTRP 2.75 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-01-11vs BP/Shonkwiler Dean L1 Team 2Won 30
W#1 DoublesLance Herndon / Lauren Barlow vs Domonic Bennett / Shelley Geib6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAshleigh Griffith / Gable Peacock vs Taylor Chapman / Daniel Wychrij7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBrandy Chandler / Josh Chandler vs Steven Niemela / Jessica Myers6-1, 6-3
2026-01-04vs OVP/CroweSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSophia Duke / Garris Duke vs James Melton / Aning Melton6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesBrandy Chandler / Josh Chandler vs Shanna Addison / Drew Addison6-7, 2-6
2025-12-21vs TGC/SandersonLost 12
W#1 DoublesTed Tarpley / Lauren Barlow vs Ansley Sanderson / Cory Sanderson6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesWanda Beard / Wendell Beard vs Josh Coffield / Kelly Loder6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJosh Chandler / Brandy Chandler vs Matt Moneyhan / Kristin Jackson6-4, 3-6, 4-6
2025-12-14vs Bishop/SnyderWon 21
L#1 DoublesLauren Barlow / Lance Herndon vs John Scott / Sharla Palmer Jones1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAshleigh Griffith / Gable Peacock vs Ella Cain / Alex Bergeron7-5, 4-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJosh Chandler / Brandy Chandler vs Nana Shao / Colin Howe6-4, 6-3
2025-11-23vs Cole/BPWon 20
W#1 DoublesSophia Duke / Garris Duke vs Robert Brutz / Crystal Filiberto6-4, 6-7, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBrandy Chandler / Josh Chandler vs Roger Bevels / Nicole Crenshaw6-4, 6-3
2025-11-16vs BP/Shonkwiler Dean L1 Team 2Won 21
L#1 DoublesTed Tarpley / Debbie Culpepper vs Elliott Johnson / Sara Shue3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesWanda Beard / Wendell Beard vs Nichole Underwood / Domonic Bennett6-4, 4-6, 7-5
W#3 DoublesBrandy Chandler / Josh Chandler vs Steven Niemela / Kimmie Hawkins6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · Flight I-6.5, 6.0, 5.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OVP Dean L-1 Team 15113513149
2OVP/Crowe4211716163
3TGC/Sanderson4210818177
4Bishop/Snyder3310819169
5BP/Shonkwiler Dean L1 Team 22461226208
6Cole/BP0641429220

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Sophia Duke
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Wes Ivester
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.28
Ted Tarpley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.27
Lance Herndon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Gable Peacock
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.15
William Culpepper
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Garris Duke
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Lauren Barlow
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.01
Wanda Beard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Wendell Beard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Debbie Culpepper
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.56
Brandy Chandler
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 2.5
2.50
Cheryl Dean
published 3
2.48
Ashleigh Griffith
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.45
Lynn Halverson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sophia Duke + Garris Duke3454% gamesnot enough data
Debbie Culpepper + William Culpepper213 matchesnot enough data
Gable Peacock + Ashleigh Griffith213 matchesnot enough data
Wanda Beard + Wendell Beard123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sophia Duke
28W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.43
Wes Ivester
39W–30L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%88%12%
3.33
Ted Tarpley
12W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Lance Herndon
28W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Gable Peacock
18W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.15
William Culpepper
14W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%14%86%
3.15
Garris Duke
7W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.07
Lauren Barlow
20W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.02
Wanda Beard
24W–41L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.01
Wendell Beard
14W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Debbie Culpepper
11W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
2.98
2.5
Brandy Chandler
33W–18L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%33%67%
2.56
3
Cheryl Dean
12W–12L career · no lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
2.50
2.5
Ashleigh Griffith
15W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%56%44%
2.48
Lynn Halverson
14W–37L career · no lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
2.45

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.