Teams

Cole/BP

2026 COTA Mixed Tri-level Winter 2025 (non-advancing) · Flight I-6.5, 6.0, 5.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.12 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-01-11vs TGC/SandersonLost 12
L#1 DoublesCali Brutz / Robert Brutz vs Luke Cross / Kristin Jackson3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesEmily Bahnsen / Derrick Bahnsen vs Kelly Loder / Justin Howard6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesNicole Crenshaw / Roger Bevels vs Matt Moneyhan / Jennifer Kennedy6-7, 3-6
2026-01-04vs BP/Shonkwiler Dean L1 Team 2Lost 12
L#1 DoublesCali Brutz / Robert Brutz vs Larry Brown / Kelly Barnhill4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesBreanne Benton / Zachary Kulik vs Zach Newton / Shelley Geib6-4, 2-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesNicole Crenshaw / Michael Kulik vs Robert Ross / Sara Shue7-5, 3-6, 4-6
2025-12-21vs Bishop/SnyderLost 12
L#1 DoublesPatrick Stanley / Julianne Schmidt vs John Scott / Katie Fife3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Kulik / Kristin Kulik vs Thierry Pagnier / Kelli Fowler2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesZachary Kulik / Esra Santesso vs Ronnie Witcher / Debbie Snyder6-1, 6-2
2025-12-14vs OVP/CroweLost 12
L#1 DoublesPatrick Stanley / Breanne Benton vs Amberlee Aboomar / Khaled Aboomar1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesEmily Bahnsen / Derrick Bahnsen vs Shanna Addison / Drew Addison3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesRoger Bevels / Esra Santesso vs Royce Crowe / Paola de Santo7-5, 7-5
2025-11-23vs OVP Dean L-1 Team 1Lost 02
L#1 DoublesRobert Brutz / Crystal Filiberto vs Sophia Duke / Garris Duke4-6, 7-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRoger Bevels / Nicole Crenshaw vs Brandy Chandler / Josh Chandler4-6, 3-6
2025-11-16vs TGC/SandersonLost 03
L#1 DoublesAngela Stanley / Patrick Stanley vs Kelsie Cross / Luke Cross0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Kulik / Kristin Kulik vs Ansley Sanderson / Cory Sanderson1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesEsra Santesso / Zachary Kulik vs Beth Moneyhan / Matt Moneyhan7-5, 4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · Flight I-6.5, 6.0, 5.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OVP Dean L-1 Team 15113513149
2OVP/Crowe4211716163
3TGC/Sanderson4210818177
4Bishop/Snyder3310819169
5BP/Shonkwiler Dean L1 Team 22461226208
6Cole/BP0641429220

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Crystal Filiberto
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Jeremiah Bame
published
2.87
Breanne Benton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.85
Michael Kulik
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.79
Zachary Kulik
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.73
Derrick Bahnsen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Kristin Kulik
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Emily Bahnsen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Cali Brutz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.55
Jen Cole
published
2.54
Vladimir Reukov
published
2.51
Jen Calabria
published
2.44
Roger Bevels
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.38
Esra Santesso
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.26
Nicole Crenshaw
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Patrick Stanley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Robert Brutz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emily Bahnsen + Derrick Bahnsen5354% games+6.7% vs expected
Michael Kulik + Kristin Kulik4842% games−18.5% vs expected
Cali Brutz + Robert Brutz5353% gamesnot enough data
Roger Bevels + Esra Santesso134 matchesnot enough data
Esra Santesso + Zachary Kulik123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Crystal Filiberto
10W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
1%84%15%
3.36
Jeremiah Bame
9W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.02
3
Breanne Benton
13W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.87
Michael Kulik
7W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.85
Zachary Kulik
6W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Derrick Bahnsen
5W–3L career · type M · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Kristin Kulik
10W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.71
Emily Bahnsen
21W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Cali Brutz
32W–34L career · 2 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
2.63
Jen Cole
23W–28L career · no lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
2.55
Vladimir Reukov
2W–6L career · no lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
2.54
Jen Calabria
22W–20L career · no lines in 2026
0%47%53%
2.51
Roger Bevels
6W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
68%32%<1%
2.44
Esra Santesso
16W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%81%19%
2.38
Nicole Crenshaw
9W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.26
Patrick Stanley
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Robert Brutz
6W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.