Teams

BP RED

2021 CTA ADULT 18-39 - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-07-22vs GTC REDLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesEllen Manwaring / Molly Buller vs Annette Isham / Caroline Slowinski6-7, 4-6
2021-07-08Lost 01
L#2 Female SinglesCayti Stein vs Rachel Williams6-7, 0-6
2021-07-07vs WP GREENWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesKatie Clymer / Cayti Stein vs Valeria Barton / Tania Orona6-0, 6-0
2021-07-06vs TTA BLUELost 01
L#2 Female SinglesMolly Buller vs Kaylee Henley1-6, 1-6
2021-06-17vs LPTC GREENSplit 11
W#1 Female DoublesKatie Clymer / Cayti Stein vs Adele Norton / Sara Springer6-4, 6-4
L#1 Female SinglesMolly Buller vs Lauren Flynn0-6, 1-6
2021-06-10vs LTA SILVERLost 01
L#1 Female SinglesCayti Stein vs Sara Campbell4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Terming Chew
published 4
3.14
Katie Clymer
published
3.11
Cayti Stein
usually #1 Female Doubles 50%, also #1 Female Singles 25% · published 3.5
2.80
Molly Buller
usually #1 Female Singles 33%, also #2 Female Singles 33% · published 3
Ellen Manwaring
published
Julie Willson
published
Karleigh Kimble
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ellen Manwaring + Karleigh Kimble4161% games+3.0% vs expected
Karleigh Kimble + Cayti Stein5450% games+2.2% vs expected
Katie Clymer + Cayti Stein1446% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Terming Chew
90W–78L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%9%
3.82
Katie Clymer
10W–23L career · no lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Cayti Stein
29W–28L career · 4 lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
3.11
3
Molly Buller
45W–52L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
2.80
Ellen Manwaring
5W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Julie Willson
5W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Karleigh Kimble
22W–20L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Kristin VonSpreecken
0W–10L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.