Teams

WP GREEN

2021 CTA ADULT 18-39 - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN

6 players · average NTRP 3.60 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-07-27vs LPTC GREENWon 20
W#1 Female SinglesMichela Zafferani vs Trang Bulawa6-3
W#2 Female SinglesValeria Barton vs Kristina Cassone6-0, 6-0
2021-07-15Split 11
W#1 Female SinglesMichela Zafferani vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 Female SinglesMegan Gunden vs Jenna Osborne5-7, 3-6
2021-07-14vs GTC REDLost 12
L#1 Female DoublesErica Nollen / Michela Zafferani vs Mallory Cleveland / Caroline Slowinski4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 Female SinglesMegan Gunden vs Annette Isham6-0, 6-0
L#2 Female SinglesValeria Barton vs Ashley Bawcum4-6, 3-6
2021-07-08vs NJ REDLost 12
L#1 Female DoublesAudrey Hamilton / Valeria Barton vs Natalie Schaefer / Aspen Lucero4-6, 5-7
L#1 Female SinglesMegan Gunden vs Theresa Price3-6, 3-6
W#2 Female SinglesMichela Zafferani vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-07-07vs BP REDSplit 11
L#1 Female DoublesValeria Barton / Tania Orona vs Katie Clymer / Cayti Stein0-6, 0-6
W#2 Female SinglesMichela Zafferani vs Kristin VonSpreecken6-3, 6-1
2021-06-17Lost 01
L#1 Female SinglesValeria Barton vs Natasha Kovacs-Hegedus0-6, 1-6
2021-06-10vs CP REDLost 02
L#1 Female DoublesAudrey Hamilton / Megan Gunden vs Lindsay Montoya / Rachel Williams1-6, 5-7
L#1 Female SinglesMichela Zafferani vs Kirsten Barton4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Erica Nollen
published 4
3.54
Michela Zafferani
usually #1 Female Singles 50%, also #2 Female Singles 33% · published 4
3.43
Megan Gunden
usually #1 Female Singles 50%, also #1 Female Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.38
Audrey Hamilton
published 3.5
2.75
Valeria Barton
usually #1 Female Doubles 40%, also #2 Female Singles 40% · published 3
Tania Orona
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Audrey Hamilton + Erica Nollen19660% games+5.5% vs expected
Audrey Hamilton + Michela Zafferani4456% games+0.4% vs expected
Michela Zafferani + Megan Gunden404 matchesnot enough data
Audrey Hamilton + Megan Gunden303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Erica Nollen
64W–28L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Michela Zafferani
102W–61L career · 6 lines in 2021
37%63%<1%
3.54
3.5
Megan Gunden
106W–51L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Audrey Hamilton
86W–47L career · no lines in 2021
<1%82%18%
3.38
3
Valeria Barton
21W–32L career · 5 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
2.75
Tania Orona
8W–7L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.