Teams

CP RED

2021 CTA ADULT 18-39 - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-07-22vs GTC REDWon 10
W#1 Female SinglesAlecxis Naviaux vs Katelin Ramer6-3, 6-0
2021-07-15vs LPTC GREENWon 10
W#1 Female SinglesAlecxis Naviaux vs Adele Norton6-1, 6-1
2021-07-08vs BP REDWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesElizabeth Phillips / Alecxis Naviaux vs Kristin VonSpreecken / Karleigh Kimble6-1, 6-4
2021-07-01vs LTA SILVERWon 10
W#1 Female SinglesAlecxis Naviaux vs Sara Campbell6-1, 6-2
2021-06-17Lost 01
L#2 Female SinglesAlecxis Naviaux vs Theresa Price6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · WOMEN 3.5 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NJ RED6014410124
2CP RED4213512131
3DTC RED4211718153
4WP GOLD3310820158
5WP RED2461228187
6CP GREEN1561227199
7BRMST RED1531530185

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Alecxis Naviaux
usually #1 Female Singles 60%, also #2 Female Singles 20% · published 4
3.52
Rachel Williams
published
3.52
Kirsten Barton
published
3.47
Laura Wasserman
published
Lindsay Montoya
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Wasserman + Rachel Williams301160% games+6.0% vs expected
Elizabeth Bernadette + Lindsay Montoya224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alecxis Naviaux
69W–37L career · 5 lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Elizabeth Bernadette
18W–12L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Rachel Williams
89W–23L career · no lines in 2021
<1%44%56%
3.52
Kirsten Barton
16W–5L career · no lines in 2021
<1%45%55%
3.52
Laura Wasserman
70W–48L career · no lines in 2021
<1%59%41%
3.47
Lindsay Montoya
8W–8L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.