Teams

A18 2.5W LT Mitchell

2024 NEOTA Adult 18 & Over Spring · NEOTA A18&O 2.5 Women Spring

10 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-04-27vs A18 2.5W PM BurkeWon 21
L#1 DoublesSandra Hunsicker / Debbie Clark vs Rhonda Newman / Michaelia Cucci1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesMarianne Ferrato vs Jessie Perkins6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Meloy / Lucinda Donze vs Valerie Quist / Dana Fisher6-3, 6-2
2024-04-13vs A18 2.5W NC AdamsLost 02
L#1 DoublesSandra Hunsicker / Debbie Clark vs Jen Zeiger / Courtney Sawhney4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesLucinda Donze / Marcia Campo vs Noelle Buso / Kelly Widders1-6, 2-6
2024-03-23vs A18 2.5W GR FosterLost 12
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Meloy / Mary Mitchell vs Lisa Mears / Carol Jackson5-7, 6-7
L#1 SinglesMarianne Ferrato vs Melanie Conner1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesMarcia Campo / Beatrica Kovacova vs Erin Kestner / Megan Nall6-0, 6-4
2024-03-16vs A18 2.5W TP LauxWon 20
W#1 DoublesMichelle Pinnow / Sarah Goel vs Theresa Leffler / Julie Dilber2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMarianne Ferrato / Debbie Clark vs Kristin Sanchez / Lisa Johnson6-2, 6-1
2024-03-09vs A18 2.5W PM BurkeLost 12
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Meloy / Mary Mitchell vs Dana Fisher / Valerie Quist6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesSarah Goel vs Morgan Webb2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMarcia Campo / Michelle Pinnow vs Laura Rucker / Kelly Wright6-3, 6-1
2024-03-02vs A18 2.5W NC AdamsWon 21
W#1 DoublesSandra Hunsicker / Debbie Clark vs Jen Spring / Rita Demarco6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesBeatrica Kovacova vs Noelle Buso1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Meloy / Lucinda Donze vs Lauren Ransdell / Kelly Widders7-5, 6-2
2024-02-10vs A18 2.5W GR FosterLost 12
W#1 DoublesSandra Hunsicker / Mary Mitchell vs Ann-Margaret Lambo / Lisa Mears7-5, 6-2
L#1 SinglesMichelle Pinnow vs Melanie Conner4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesLucinda Donze / Marianne Ferrato vs Jennifer Diroll / Staci Schweikert7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2024-02-03vs A18 2.5W TP LauxLost 12
L#1 DoublesMary Mitchell / Marianne Ferrato vs Michelle Akhtar / Toni Sexton0-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesAmy McDougal vs Anne Laux3-2
W#2 DoublesMichelle Pinnow / Marcia Campo vs Susan Reese / Kyrstn Was0-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · NEOTA A18&O 2.5 Women Spring
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1A18 2.5W FRR Dworakowski8017719201
2A18 2.5W PM Burke6215922199
3A18 2.5W WE Stachiw63171025211
4A18 2.5W CRC Goldsmith63161129230
5A18 2.5W NC Adams5317715158
6A18 2.5W MM Debenham44121228230
7A18 2.5W GR Foster44101431242
8A18 2.5W CV Fromson45101735255
9A18 2.5W CC Wotawa35121226201
10A18 2.5W MV2 Ventre35101428220
11A18 2.5W LT Mitchell35101430228
12A18 2.5W WR Fete2691532241
13A18 2.5W TP Laux2681635236
14A18 2.5W MV1 Carracher27111635264

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.54 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Elizabeth Meloy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.80
Amy McDougal
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.50
Michelle Pinnow
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.35
Sarah Goel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Beatrica Kovacova
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 2.5
Debbie Clark
published 2.5
2.06
Marcia Campo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lucinda Donze
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Marianne Ferrato
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Sandra Hunsicker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Pinnow + Sarah Goel11359% games+13.4% vs expected
Marianne Ferrato + Lucinda Donze2444% games−0.7% vs expected
Amy McDougal + Elizabeth Meloy121249% games−2.8% vs expected
Lucinda Donze + Elizabeth Meloy314 matchesnot enough data
Marcia Campo + Beatrica Kovacova224 matchesnot enough data
Sandra Hunsicker + Lucinda Donze303 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Pinnow + Elizabeth Meloy213 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Pinnow + Marcia Campo213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Elizabeth Meloy
81W–55L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Amy McDougal
28W–40L career · 1 line in 2024
1%93%6%
2.80
Michelle Pinnow
34W–27L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%51%49%
2.50
Sarah Goel
21W–16L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%88%12%
2.35
2.5
Beatrica Kovacova
9W–14L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
2.5
Debbie Clark
12W–15L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Marcia Campo
6W–8L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Lucinda Donze
17W–23L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Marianne Ferrato
35W–40L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sandra Hunsicker
45W–45L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.