Teams

A18 2.5W WE Stachiw

2024 NEOTA Adult 18 & Over Spring · NEOTA A18&O 2.5 Women Spring

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-04-13vs A18 2.5W MV1 CarracherLost 02
L#1 DoublesMindy Qua / Jennifer Zidar vs Sara Carracher / Neeti Sundaresh5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAlayna Stachiw / Samantha Williams vs Aimee Hannan / Noor Almudallal6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2024-04-06vs A18 2.5W CV FromsonWon 20
W#1 DoublesJanelle Siebenschuh / Rachel Uram vs Anne Halper / Jill Fanos6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Zidar / Carla Stachiw vs Lila Meacham / Krista Ensign6-1, 6-1
2024-03-23vs A18 2.5W CRC GoldsmithSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAlayna Stachiw / Carla Stachiw vs Meredith Bond / Nancy Goldsmith6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesJennifer Zidar vs Kimberly Corbets2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-03-16vs A18 2.5W MV1 CarracherWon 20
W#1 DoublesKatherine Busby / Jennifer Zidar vs Neeti Sundaresh / Meredith Reimer5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAlayna Stachiw / Samantha Williams vs Aimee Hannan / Kristin Blaser6-2, 6-3
2024-03-09vs A18 2.5W CV FromsonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJanelle Siebenschuh / Rachel Uram vs Carrie Fromson / Robin Kleinman6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesGail Vogel / Dawn Williams vs Beverly Chambers / Anne Halper1-6, 4-6
2024-03-02vs A18 2.5W CRC GoldsmithWon 21
W#1 DoublesJanelle Siebenschuh / Carla Stachiw vs Kimberly Corbets / Anne Cochran7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAlayna Stachiw vs Julie Shoemaker6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSamantha Williams / Katherine Busby vs Montserrat de la Huerta / Linda Koch6-7, 6-7
2024-02-24vs A18 2.5W MV1 CarracherSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKristin Wallace / Carla Stachiw vs Noor Almudallal / Aimee Hannan6-3, 6-0
L#1 SinglesAlayna Stachiw vs Sara Carracher6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2024-02-10vs A18 2.5W CV FromsonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMindy Qua / Katherine Busby vs Carrie Fromson / Krista Ensign3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCarla Stachiw / Gail Vogel vs Lori Kaminski / Jill Fanos6-0, 6-3
2024-02-03vs A18 2.5W CRC GoldsmithSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJanelle Siebenschuh / Rachel Uram vs Meredith Bond / Veronica Chopra6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMini Menon / Gail Vogel vs Kimberly Corbets / Marina Timush1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · NEOTA A18&O 2.5 Women Spring
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1A18 2.5W FRR Dworakowski8017719201
2A18 2.5W PM Burke6215922199
3A18 2.5W WE Stachiw63171025211
4A18 2.5W CRC Goldsmith63161129230
5A18 2.5W NC Adams5317715158
6A18 2.5W MM Debenham44121228230
7A18 2.5W GR Foster44101431242
8A18 2.5W CV Fromson45101735255
9A18 2.5W CC Wotawa35121226201
10A18 2.5W MV2 Ventre35101428220
11A18 2.5W LT Mitchell35101430228
12A18 2.5W WR Fete2691532241
13A18 2.5W TP Laux2681635236
14A18 2.5W MV1 Carracher27111635264

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.49 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.77
Janelle Siebenschuh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Alayna Stachiw
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.71
Jennifer Zidar
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.70
Rachel Uram
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Carla Stachiw
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.32
Mindy Qua
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.21
Katherine Busby
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.02
Gail Vogel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mini Menon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Samantha Williams
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rachel Uram + Janelle Siebenschuh8073% games+12.8% vs expected
Gail Vogel + Mindy Qua4355% games+10.8% vs expected
Katherine Busby + Mindy Qua4455% games+1.7% vs expected
Gail Vogel + Katherine Busby213 matchesnot enough data
Carla Stachiw + Janelle Siebenschuh123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Janelle Siebenschuh
26W–16L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Alayna Stachiw
6W–5L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jennifer Zidar
28W–24L career · 4 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.71
Rachel Uram
17W–10L career · 3 lines in 2024
8%90%1%
2.70
3
Carla Stachiw
33W–43L career · 6 lines in 2024
8%90%1%
2.69
Mindy Qua
21W–32L career · 2 lines in 2024
90%10%<1%
2.32
Katherine Busby
23W–47L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%98%2%
2.21
Gail Vogel
18W–25L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.02
Mini Menon
3W–7L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Samantha Williams
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.