Teams

Team Medzegian

2021 One Doubles · 3.5 Men

1 player · average NTRP / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings22 teams · 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
110isNE16060036
2Vij6060242
3J&B6060348
4BC-Breakers 20215151229
5Back pain, Achilles and Frozen shoulder5151331
6SSDG5151450
7Team Gipson/Krimmel4242760
8Cac3232438
9Shock and Awe3333650
10MICC-Hounsell/Thomas3333751
11Double Up3333752
12RM Tennis3333857
13Lindens2323753
14Wanat/Bailey2424957
15No Chans24241063
16BelRed Blasters1414851
17Rusty Federers1414960
18MICC-Peck15151066
19SliceSliceBaby05051059
20Team Medzegian06061272
21Malone06061272
22AlwaysBeClosing06061270

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Jeffrey Medzegian
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeffrey Medzegian
6W–6L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.81

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.