Teams

LANEY TA/ALAMEDA HS 40AM3.5B

2024 ADULT 40&Over · Men's 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-03-10vs CLAREMONT R and S 40AM3.5AWon 10
W#2 DoublesGary Fries / Benjamin Cha vs Rolan Reichel / Jason Cohn3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-03-09Won 10
W#3 DoublesBenjamin Cha / Gerardo Rodriguez vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-02-24vs WASHINGTON PK 40AM3.5ALost 01
L#1 DoublesMilton Gee / Benjamin Cha vs Eugene Yu / Jeffrey Cannon3-6, 3-6
2024-02-11vs CHABOT CANYON 40AM3.5ALost 01
L#1 DoublesBenjamin Cha / Doug Kearney vs Mario Oliveros / Hendrik van Maldegem2-6, 3-6
2024-02-10vs RICHMOND TA/NICHOLL PK 40AM3.5ALost 01
L#1 DoublesNilo Clava / Benjamin Cha vs Inderjit Dhillon / MacE Thompson6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2024-01-14vs CLAREMONT R and S 40AM3.5CLost 01
L#1 DoublesBenjamin Cha / Derrick Wong vs Malik Harris / Prakash Nagpal5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Rey Melencion
published
3.41
William Fung
published
3.37
Milton Gee
published
3.36
Benjamin Cha
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.29
Nilo Clava
published
3.22
David Dunetz
published 3.5
3.16
Daniel Bao
published 3.5
3.11
Gary Fries
published
3.10
James Wu
published
3.09
Derrick Wong
published 3.5
Doug Kearney
published
Frank Li
published
Guillaume Decerprit
published
Roger Lambert
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rey Melencion
9W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.42
William Fung
8W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.41
Milton Gee
18W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Benjamin Cha
64W–60L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
3.36
Nilo Clava
16W–8L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
David Dunetz
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Daniel Bao
7W–13L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.16
Gary Fries
28W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%22%78%
3.11
James Wu
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.10
3.5
Derrick Wong
3W–13L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.09
Doug Kearney
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Frank Li
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Guillaume Decerprit
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Roger Lambert
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.