Teams

Tami Tri

2024 Anne Arundel Tri-Level 18 & Over · Anne Arundel Tri-Level 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.92 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule16 played
2024-09-22vs Gunther/WilliamsWon 10
W#3 DoublesEva Safrankova / Lezlie Moreland vs Jennifer Coady / Elizabeth Jacobson6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2024-09-19Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLezlie Moreland / Dale Clark vs Ellen McLaughlin / Lisa Thompson4-6, 1-6
2024-09-14vs NicholsonWon 10
W#1 DoublesSue Fisher / Tatiana Loboda vs Dina Esterowitz / Tara Okieffe6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-09-11vs NicholsonLost 02
L#2 DoublesEllen McLaughlin / Brandie Sparr vs Joi Remoll / Katherine Tindall0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCindy Mexcur / Mary Wallace vs Zoie Acadia / Belinda McLean4-6, 5-7
2024-09-08vs MartinSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBrandie Sparr / Lisa Thompson vs Dina Caddeo / Xenia Baranova6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCindy Mexcur / Stephanie Mackowiak vs Belinda McLean / Melissa Donato7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2024-09-07vs Gunther/WilliamsLost 01
L#3 DoublesTami Burt / Cindy Mexcur vs Amy Dawson / Karen Yannone7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2024-09-03vs Gunther/WilliamsLost 01
L#3 DoublesMelissa Albers / Mary Wallace vs Lisa Walsh / Karen Yannone6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2024-09-01vs Gunther/WilliamsLost 01
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Jacobson / Lezlie Moreland vs Stephanie Riley / Robin Atkins4-6, 3-6
2024-08-28vs Gunther/WilliamsLost 01
L#3 DoublesEva Safrankova / Lezlie Moreland vs Elizabeth Jacobson / Jennifer Coady3-6, 2-6
2024-08-25vs MartinLost 01
L#2 DoublesLisa Walsh / Lezlie Moreland vs Jenny Lopez / Stephanie Mackowiak3-6, 1-6
2024-08-24vs NicholsonLost 02
L#1 DoublesCathy Shields / Tatiana Loboda vs Leslie Baird / Anne Marie Peterson2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesLezlie Moreland / Melissa Albers vs Martha Nolan / Belinda McLean5-7, 2-6
2024-08-20vs MartinLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Thompson / Brandie Sparr vs Dina Caddeo / Jenny Lopez2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-08-14vs NicholsonLost 02
L#1 DoublesSue Fisher / Tatiana Loboda vs Ellen Berlinghof / Caryn Vollmer4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesHelen Patterson / Brandie Sparr vs Jennifer Mitchell / Wendy Jones1-6, 1-6
2024-08-05vs Gunther/WilliamsWon 10
W#2 DoublesCindy Mexcur / Masako Murphy vs Melissa Donato / Laura Laabs3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-08-04vs NicholsonLost 02
L#1 DoublesNannette Littlejohn / Tatiana Loboda vs Tara Okieffe / Dina Esterowitz2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMelissa Albers / Eva Safrankova vs Jodi Hathaway / Martha Nolan4-6, 0-6
2024-08-03vs NicholsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesLezlie Moreland / Lisa Walsh vs Arina Kravitz / Martha Nolan0-6, 2-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Tri-Level 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Cathy Shields
published 4.5
4.16
Sue Fisher
published
4.05
Tatiana Loboda
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.82
Rachel Grula
published
3.81
Jennifer Noronha
published
3.73
Brandie Sparr
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.67
Ellen McLaughlin
published
3.65
Helen Patterson
published
3.51
Eva Safrankova
published
3.37
Lezlie Moreland
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.35
Cindy Mexcur
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.31
Mary Wallace
published
3.23
Tami Burt
published
3.04
Melissa Albers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Laura Avallone
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tatiana Loboda + Sue Fisher3254% games+6.1% vs expected
Melissa Albers + Lezlie Moreland5846% games−4.4% vs expected
Cindy Mexcur + Lezlie Moreland4254% gamesnot enough data
Cindy Mexcur + Tami Burt123 matchesnot enough data
Brandie Sparr + Ellen McLaughlin213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cathy Shields
19W–12L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
4.21
Sue Fisher
23W–27L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
4.16
4.5
Tatiana Loboda
178W–130L career · 4 lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
4.05
Rachel Grula
1W–7L career · no lines in 2024
91%9%<1%
3.82
Jennifer Noronha
10W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Brandie Sparr
104W–102L career · 4 lines in 2024
5%92%2%
3.73
Ellen McLaughlin
14W–10L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.67
Helen Patterson
10W–13L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.65
Eva Safrankova
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
3.51
3.5
Lezlie Moreland
157W–166L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Cindy Mexcur
161W–156L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.35
Mary Wallace
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
Tami Burt
4W–11L career · no lines in 2024
97%3%<1%
3.23
3.5
Melissa Albers
85W–110L career · 3 lines in 2024
38%61%<1%
3.04
Laura Avallone
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.