Teams

Gilbert/LF

2024 TUL MIXED 40 & Over League · 7.0 MIXED

13 players · average NTRP 3.30 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-09vs declined: Martinez/ISLost 03
L#1 DoublesMark Foy / Kelley Elam vs Scott Thomas / Kerri Leek6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesShaun Robinson / Dione Sturd vs Brian Conway / Andrea Winters4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesShaun James / Natalie Gilbert vs George Martinez / Sharla Smith5-7, 2-6
2024-04-21vs Press/GRLost 12
L#1 DoublesBarbara Rayll / Andrew Habiger vs Shannon Faulkner / David Martin1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesAbby Kurin / Tae Kim vs Beth Scruggs / Todd Scruggs3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesNatalie Gilbert / Shaun James vs Cynthia Elias / Chris Ferris6-2, 6-3
2024-04-12vs Dubois/LFLost 12
L#1 DoublesTae Kim / Adria Sanditen vs Steven Anagnost / Shelley Lewis6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAndrew Habiger / Abby Kurin vs Ryan Bedrosian / Brenna DuBois3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesShaun James / Melinda Young vs Elizabeth Bell / Raymond Chiu6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2024-04-07vs MOVALLEY/Dickason/mixed40&overxSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMark Foy / Kelley Elam vs Sarah Davis / Paul Richardson7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesShaun James / Melinda Young vs Robert Coffey / Ginger Coffey6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2024-03-29vs Nichols/LF 40s 7.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesAndrew Habiger / Barbara Rayll vs Theresa Wisner-Lee / Keith Henley6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTae Kim / Adria Sanditen vs Bret McGuire / Chelsea Mitchell6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesShaun Robinson / Dione Sturd vs Anissa Mcguire / Chris Moody4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-03-27vs Leonard 7.0/GRLost 12
L#1 DoublesBarbara Rayll / Andrew Habiger vs Krys Allen / Heather Palomino1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTae Kim / Adria Sanditen vs John Kunick / Kay Jones4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesShaun Robinson / Dione Sturd vs Brian Leonard / Stacy Holdman5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2024-03-03vs Wyatt/SHLost 12
L#1 DoublesMark Foy / Kelley Elam vs Michael Coonce / Laura Vidal3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesShaun James / Melinda Young vs Matthew Bristow / Cyndy Phillips4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAndrew Habiger / Abby Kurin vs Bailey Bird / Christopher Bird7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 7.0 MIXED
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MOVALLEY/Dickason/mixed40&overx8018615183
2declined: Martinez/IS6218619197
3Nichols/LF 40s 7.06216822221
4Dubois/LF53141024216
5Williams 40s 7.0/PH53131124207
6Boyd/IS44111329242
7Elizondo/LF3491226205
8Leonard 7.0/GR3491227196
9Mitchell/PH26101430232
10Mullenix 40/LF2681635265
11Gilbert/LF0761534233

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Andrew Habiger
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.44
Tae Kim
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.31
Melinda Young
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
David Jennings
published 3.5
3.00
Kelley Elam
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Shaun James
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
2.82
Abby Kurin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.68
Adria Sanditen
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.62
Dione Sturd
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.45
Barbara Rayll
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Mark Foy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Natalie Gilbert
published
Shaun Robinson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Foy + Kelley Elam6356% games−0.8% vs expected
Adria Sanditen + Shaun James3252% gamesnot enough data
Shaun James + Melinda Young3251% gamesnot enough data
Shaun Robinson + Dione Sturd123 matchesnot enough data
Adria Sanditen + Tae Kim123 matchesnot enough data
Barbara Rayll + Andrew Habiger033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrew Habiger
14W–30L career · type M · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tae Kim
21W–64L career · 4 lines in 2024
68%32%<1%
3.44
Melinda Young
54W–50L career · 3 lines in 2024
92%8%<1%
3.31
3.5
David Jennings
9W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kelley Elam
108W–79L career · 3 lines in 2024
50%50%<1%
3.00
Shaun James
86W–72L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Abby Kurin
53W–43L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Adria Sanditen
80W–75L career · 5 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
2.68
Dione Sturd
46W–27L career · 10 lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
2.62
3
Barbara Rayll
11W–50L career · 3 lines in 2024
64%36%<1%
2.45
Mark Foy
78W–50L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Natalie Gilbert
84W–57L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Shaun Robinson
22W–21L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.