Teams

ETA RED

2023 USTA ADULT 65 & OVER - NOCO · WOMEN 6.0 - 65 & OVER - NOCO

6 players · average NTRP 2.67 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-08-11vs LTA BLUELost 02
L#2 DoublesDiane Holmberg / Koleen Schriever vs Patty Orban / Jan DeBruin1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAlexina Campbell / Glenna Cook vs Kathleen Sargent / Catherine Sattler2-6, 2-6
2023-08-04vs CSU GREENLost 02
L#2 DoublesAlexina Campbell / Carolyn Prior vs Trudy Eckhardt / Marla Wieck2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesGlenna Cook / Koleen Schriever vs Bernice Boyer / Leslie Walker2-6, 3-6
2023-07-28vs HMTC PURPLELost 02
L#2 DoublesDiane Holmberg / Koleen Schriever vs Jane Koepp / Ingrid Parsons3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAlexina Campbell / Glenna Cook vs Donna Taub / Sandra Overman2-6, 0-6
2023-07-21vs LTA BLUELost 01
L#3 DoublesKoleen Schriever / Shelly Donahue vs Kathleen Sargent / Jan DeBruin3-6, 4-6
2023-07-14Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAlexina Campbell / Glenna Cook vs Leslie Walker / Trudy Eckhardt1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-07-07vs HMTC PURPLELost 01
L#2 DoublesKoleen Schriever / Carolyn Prior vs Patti Ingels / Jane Koepp2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 6.0 - 65 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.27 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.40
Koleen Schriever
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
Diane Holmberg
published 2.5
2.15
Alexina Campbell
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Gail Sullivan
published
Glenna Cook
published
Shelly Donahue
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Glenna Cook + Alexina Campbell0724% gamesnot enough data
Glenna Cook + Koleen Schriever0534% gamesnot enough data
Alexina Campbell + Koleen Schriever1430% gamesnot enough data
Gail Sullivan + Alexina Campbell044 matchesnot enough data
Koleen Schriever + Shelly Donahue134 matchesnot enough data
Glenna Cook + Gail Sullivan033 matchesnot enough data
Glenna Cook + Shelly Donahue123 matchesnot enough data
Gail Sullivan + Koleen Schriever033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Koleen Schriever
6W–36L career · type A · 5 lines in 2023
76%24%<1%
2.40
2.5
Diane Holmberg
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
2.5
Alexina Campbell
2W–27L career · 4 lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.15
Gail Sullivan
0W–16L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Glenna Cook
1W–17L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Shelly Donahue
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.