← Teams

CSU GREEN

2023 USTA ADULT 65 & OVER - NOCO · WOMEN 6.0 - 65 & OVER - NOCO

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-08-11vs HMTC PURPLESplit 1–1
L#1 DoublesBernita Sterling / Deborah Lockwood vs Mary Gabiola / Marcee Gustafson5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesTrudy Eckhardt / Marla Wieck vs Patti Ingels / Ingrid Parsons6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2023-08-04vs ETA REDWon 2–0
W#1 DoublesJacalyn Petersen / Bernita Sterling vs Shelly Donahue / Gail Sullivan6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesTrudy Eckhardt / Marla Wieck vs Alexina Campbell / Carolyn Prior6-2, 6-1
2023-07-28vs LTA BLUEWon 2–1
W#1 DoublesDeborah Lockwood / Bernita Sterling vs Catherine Sattler / TOMOKO WATANABE5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJacalyn Petersen / Nancy Pajak vs Jan DeBruin / Patty Orban6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCathy Simocko-Smith / Marla Wieck vs Kathleen Murphy / Sandy Wheaton7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2023-07-21vs HMTC PURPLELost 0–2
L#1 DoublesJacalyn Petersen / Susan Prentice vs Marcee Gustafson / Mary Gabiola6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLeslie Walker / Cathy Simocko-Smith vs Linda Berkheim / Patti Ingels5-7, 2-6
2023-07-14vs ETA REDWon 1–0
W#2 DoublesBernita Sterling / Cathy Simocko-Smith vs Gail Sullivan / Carolyn Prior6-4, 7-5
2023-07-07vs LTA BLUELost 0–2
L#1 DoublesSusan Prentice / Nancy Pajak vs Susanna Bolton / TOMOKO WATANABE7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTrudy Eckhardt / Marla Wieck vs Kathleen Murphy / Catherine Sattler0-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 6.0 - 65 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Jacalyn Petersen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.07
Cathy Simocko-Smith
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.89
Nancy Pajak
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.77
Marla Wieck
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.59
Bernita Sterling
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bernita Sterling + Cathy Simocko-Smith7–456% games−9.5% vs expected
Nancy Pajak + Bernita Sterling2–13 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Jacalyn Petersen
71W–32L career · type S · 3 lines in 2023
<1%21%79%
3.11
3
Cathy Simocko-Smith
42W–27L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%32%68%
3.07
3
Nancy Pajak
56W–74L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Marla Wieck
24W–27L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Bernita Sterling
71W–106L career · 4 lines in 2023
26%73%<1%
2.59

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.