Teams

Northern: Cary 55 8.0 Men

2025 55&Over Men · 8.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-08-26vs Hanleys HeroesWon 21
L#1 DoublesPatrick Bologna / Robert Farley vs Chris Hanley / Chris Laflamme4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesDavid Denny / Donald McGoldrick vs Dana Hood / Kenneth Ritzenberg6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJames Cary / David Wells vs Chris Foster / Venkat Kolagunta2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-08-19vs Hanleys HeroesWon 21
L#1 DoublesJames Axford / Patrick Bologna vs Chris Laflamme / Michael Marsh1-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesWilliam DeSantis / David Wells vs Nixon de Tarnowsky / George Werle7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDouglas Doherty / Thomas Schmitz vs Chris Hanley / Matt Picardi5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-08-12vs Hanleys HeroesWon 21
W#1 DoublesJames Axford / Patrick Bologna vs Matt Picardi / John Enzien3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRobert Farley / David Wells vs Nixon de Tarnowsky / George Werle7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDonald McGoldrick / Mike Gioia vs Chris Foster / Michael Akker1-6, 1-6
2025-08-05vs Hanleys HeroesWon 30
W#1 DoublesJames Axford / Robert Farley vs John Enzien / Dana Hood6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesWilliam DeSantis / David Wells vs Chris Laflamme / George Werle7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJohn Evans / James Cary vs Venkat Kolagunta / Kenneth Ritzenberg6-1, 6-0
2025-07-29vs Hanleys HeroesLost 12
W#1 DoublesJames Axford / Robert Farley vs John Enzien / Chris Hanley6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesPatrick Bologna / Donald McGoldrick vs Michael Akker / Chris Foster3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesGary Henning / Kevin O'Connor vs William MacArthur / Nixon de Tarnowsky3-6, 5-7
2025-07-22vs Hanleys HeroesWon 21
W#1 DoublesJames Axford / William DeSantis vs Dana Hood / Matt Picardi6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMike Gioia / Donald McGoldrick vs William MacArthur / Nixon de Tarnowsky3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesThomas Schmitz / James Cary vs Kenneth Ritzenberg / George Werle6-2, 6-4
2025-07-08vs Hanleys HeroesLost 12
W#1 DoublesJames Axford / Kevin O'Connor vs Chris Hanley / Dana Hood4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPatrick Bologna / Robert Farley vs Michael Akker / Chris Foster4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Evans / Gary Henning vs Chris Laflamme / George Werle2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Northern: Cary 55 8.0 Men5213821192
2Hanleys Heroes2581326205

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Robert Farley
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.86
James Axford
usually #1 Doubles 82%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published 4
Donald McGoldrick
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.71
Gary Henning
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.56
David Wells
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.34
Douglas Doherty
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.19
James Cary
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Kevin O'Connor
published
Mike Gioia
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Patrick Bologna
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Thomas Schmitz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
William DeSantis
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

James Cary + Douglas Doherty4257% games+1.5% vs expected
James Axford + David Wells5453% games−0.7% vs expected
James Axford + Patrick Bologna91151% games−4.3% vs expected
Robert Farley + James Axford5170% gamesnot enough data
James Axford + Douglas Doherty6061% gamesnot enough data
Mike Gioia + Donald McGoldrick2338% gamesnot enough data
James Cary + Thomas Schmitz3257% gamesnot enough data
James Axford + William DeSantis314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robert Farley
28W–42L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.89
4
James Axford
167W–135L career · 11 lines in 2025
<1%85%14%
3.86
4
Donald McGoldrick
12W–20L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Gary Henning
53W–86L career · 6 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.71
4
David Wells
44W–43L career · 5 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Douglas Doherty
103W–127L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
James Cary
31W–40L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
Kevin O'Connor
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mike Gioia
7W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Patrick Bologna
50W–83L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Thomas Schmitz
22W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
William DeSantis
17W–18L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.