Teams

V - Valle Lindo Rockets

2022 USTA Adult 40 &Over - Ventura · Ventura - Women 3.5 WE

15 players · average NTRP 3.31 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-03-27vs V - Ojai OrangesWon 10
W#1 SinglesPatricia Ameca vs Lynne Krueger7-6, 6-1
L#1 SinglesPatricia Ameca vs Kasia Domenech2-6, 5-7
2022-02-13vs V - North Ranch Body ShotsLost 01
L#2 DoublesStella Dumlao-Idea / Denise Bolish vs Tracy Collins / Coco Inamori6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2022-01-29vs V - Sherwood StarsWon 20
W#1 SinglesPatricia Ameca vs Nara Choi6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesStella Dumlao-Idea / Deisy Lotz vs Connie Mundell / Rosella Farnum6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-01-22vs V - Sunset Hot ShotsLost 01
L#1 DoublesPatricia Ameca / Wendy Williams vs Marie Smith / Nicole Mitchell4-6, 0-6
2022-01-16vs V - Sunset Serves You RightWon 21
W#1 DoublesLauren Napoli / Lindsey Rodman vs Leslie Resnick / Nancy Schmidt6-3, 7-5
W#1 SinglesPatricia Ameca vs Ann Francisco6-0, 7-5
L#2 DoublesKristin Pena / Stella Dumlao-Idea vs Laura McLaughlin / Claudia Bay3-6, 0-6
2022-01-09vs V - Las Posas Got ShotsWon 10
W#2 DoublesAdele Valenzuela / Denise Bolish vs Dee Ann Emami / Debra Kolibas6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 3.5 WE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Lauren Napoli
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.46
Patricia Ameca
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.44
Denise Bolish
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.33
Lindsey Rodman
published
3.20
Marcie McTigue
published
3.19
Myla Hanson
published
3.19
Eva Ettedgui
published 3.5
3.18
Barbara Nelles
published 3.5
3.08
Judy Liu
published
3.02
Julie Kurowski
published
2.98
Rhonda Mosser
published
2.93
Stacy Ball
published 3
2.84
Stella Dumlao-Idea
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.56
Deisy Lotz
published 3
Wendy Williams
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lindsey Rodman + Lauren Napoli7655% games+3.8% vs expected
Judy Liu + Marcie McTigue3346% games−8.4% vs expected
Judy Liu + Julie Kurowski0727% games−21.4% vs expected
Stella Dumlao-Idea + Patricia Ameca3545% gamesnot enough data
Denise Bolish + Stella Dumlao-Idea224 matchesnot enough data
Judy Liu + Barbara Nelles123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lauren Napoli
144W–52L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%48%52%
3.51
3.5
Patricia Ameca
113W–92L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Denise Bolish
123W–60L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
3.44
Lindsey Rodman
6W–3L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
Marcie McTigue
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
Myla Hanson
7W–9L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Eva Ettedgui
9W–4L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Barbara Nelles
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
Judy Liu
8W–16L career · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.08
Julie Kurowski
4W–16L career · no lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
3.02
Rhonda Mosser
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
57%43%<1%
2.98
3
Stacy Ball
131W–150L career · no lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Stella Dumlao-Idea
180W–184L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
Deisy Lotz
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
2.56
Wendy Williams
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.