Teams

V - LLW-Moorpark Acing Gracefully-R Wager

2022 USTA Adult 40 &Over - Ventura · Ventura - Women 3.5 WE

11 players · average NTRP 3.67 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 SinglesDeanne Saucerman vs Julie Hill6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKasia Domenech / Lisa Kapur vs Diana Clark / Pam Nesseth6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRuth Wager / Jennifer Hammond vs Sarah Smith / Wissal Buscemi6-3, 6-4
2022-02-19vs V - Valle Lindo RocketsWon 40
W#1 DoublesLisa Kapur / Deanne Saucerman vs Deisy Lotz / Gae Thomas6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesKasia Domenech vs Patricia Ameca6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMichele Ploudre / Lisa Trombley vs Judy Liu / Barbara Nelles4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAnita Spraggs / Jennifer Hammond vs Marcie McTigue / Sandra Sedo6-2, 6-2
2022-02-12vs V - Sherwood StarsWon 21
W#1 DoublesSusan Wood / Lisa Yoshimura vs Laura Leff / Renee Christopher6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesDeanne Saucerman vs Karen Friedman6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMichele Ploudre / Anita Spraggs vs Nara Choi / Teresa Zobrist6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2022-02-05vs V - Sunset Hot ShotsWon 31
L#1 DoublesMary Snow / Lisa Yoshimura vs Nicole Mitchell / Marie Smith4-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesKasia Domenech vs Gina Vazquez6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRuth Wager / Lisa Kapur vs Susan Consoletti / Michelle Lambert6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMichele Ploudre / Lisa Trombley vs Megan Mathews / Marilou Cheung6-3, 6-2
2022-01-29vs V - Sunset Serves You RightWon 30
W#1 SinglesDeanne Saucerman vs Andrea Pakula7-6, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMichele Ploudre / Kasia Domenech vs Ann Francisco / Churee Josephson6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Hammond / Anita Spraggs vs Stacie Wild / Marion Larkin6-2, 6-1
2022-01-22vs V - North Ranch Ace AngelsWon 30
W#1 DoublesMary Snow / Ruth Wager vs Sonia Bekian / Tammy Snyder6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesKasia Domenech vs Adora Chu7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLisa Yoshimura / Lisa Kapur vs Amy Whitney / Gillian Greding6-1, 6-1
2022-01-15vs V - WAC Penn PalsSplit 22
W#1 DoublesSusan Wood / Lisa Yoshimura vs Laura Mealer / Beth Bearer2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDeanne Saucerman vs Karakoz Williams6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAnita Spraggs / Lisa Kapur vs Georgann Lott / Keely McKnight4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesSusan Delaney / Lisa Trombley vs Kathleen Schatz / Karen Kolosieke1-6, 6-7
2022-01-08vs V - Ojai OrangesWon 20
W#1 SinglesDeanne Saucerman vs Joanne Matibag6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRuth Wager / Kasia Domenech vs Lynne Krueger / Cindy LuLu Young7-5, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 3.5 WE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.09
Deanne Saucerman
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
3.73
Kasia Domenech
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.52
Lisa Kapur
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.39
Michele Ploudre
published
3.25
Lisa Trombley
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Jennie Costello
published
3.13
Lisa Yoshimura
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.10
Anita Spraggs
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.10
Susan Delaney
published
3.09
Mary Snow
published
3.03
Ruth Wager
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Kapur + Lisa Trombley16464% games+11.9% vs expected
Ruth Wager + Lisa Kapur7357% gamesnot enough data
Kasia Domenech + Deanne Saucerman5358% gamesnot enough data
Ruth Wager + Lisa Trombley2449% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Yoshimura + Lisa Kapur4256% gamesnot enough data
Kasia Domenech + Lisa Kapur2344% gamesnot enough data
Ruth Wager + Susan Delaney3251% gamesnot enough data
Kasia Domenech + Anita Spraggs404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Deanne Saucerman
156W–88L career · 6 lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
4.09
4
Kasia Domenech
115W–63L career · 6 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
3.5
Lisa Kapur
142W–64L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%44%56%
3.52
Michele Ploudre
13W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Lisa Trombley
76W–59L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Jennie Costello
8W–3L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Lisa Yoshimura
118W–165L career · 6 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.13
3
Anita Spraggs
72W–83L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%21%79%
3.10
Susan Delaney
8W–7L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
Mary Snow
37W–34L career · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.09
Ruth Wager
62W–77L career · 4 lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.03

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.