Teams

What the heck/Lewis/Burlingame

2024 Tri-Level 3.5 · 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.92 / NO. CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-10-26vs Menions/Shih/Mountain ViewLost 03
L#1 DoublesPinoe Chu / David Meacham vs Allen Shih / Daniel Lu5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJonathan Felder / Andy Ting vs Chuo-Yun Yang / Henny Huang1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJacques Fayet-Faber / Craig Quan vs Matthew Liem / Chris Ling6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2024-10-25vs Ham Choi/Nguyen/Castro ValleyLost 03
L#1 DoublesPinoe Chu / Mike Alcheck vs Sanjeev Sinha / Nicholas Saquilayan4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTodd Lewis / Shridharan Muthu vs Joseph Nguyen / Scott Jen4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCraig Quan / Paul Swink vs Tanumaya Tiwari / Ryan Kuo1-6, 0-6
2024-10-25vs Pain in the Ace/Austero/OakleyLost 03
L#1 DoublesPinoe Chu / Mike Alcheck vs Antonio Ambriz / Douglas Nau2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAndy Ting / Shridharan Muthu vs Aaron Lee / Moses Reyes0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJacques Fayet-Faber / Lawren Wu vs Joel Belangdal / Gary Nelson Tolentino2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Pinoe Chu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.10
Johannes Knueppel
published
4.02
David Meacham
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.88
Mike Alcheck
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.85
Jonathan Felder
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.82
Shridharan Muthu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.57
Todd Lewis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Craig Quan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
Andy Ting
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.39
Jacques Fayet-Faber
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Adam Bloom
published 3.5
2.90
Paul Swink
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lawren Wu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Pinoe Chu
22W–19L career · 3 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
4.21
Johannes Knueppel
10W–7L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
4.10
4.5
David Meacham
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2024
45%55%<1%
4.02
Mike Alcheck
4W–9L career · 2 lines in 2024
80%20%<1%
3.88
Jonathan Felder
4W–12L career · 1 line in 2024
85%15%<1%
3.85
Shridharan Muthu
10W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.82
Todd Lewis
21W–13L career · 1 line in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.57
3.5
Craig Quan
6W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
3.45
4
Andy Ting
2W–16L career · 2 lines in 2024
77%23%<1%
3.40
3.5
Jacques Fayet-Faber
13W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Adam Bloom
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Paul Swink
5W–12L career · 1 line in 2024
77%23%<1%
2.90
Lawren Wu
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.