Teams

Ham Choi/Nguyen/Castro Valley

2024 Tri-Level 3.5 · 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 4.33 / NO. CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-10-25vs Menions/Shih/Mountain ViewWon 21
W#1 DoublesSanjeev Sinha / Nathan Gong vs Mitch Hu / Jason Kuo6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJoseph Nguyen / Scott Jen vs Chuo-Yun Yang / Henny Huang6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTanumaya Tiwari / Jesse Terrel-Perez vs Chris Ling / Matthew Liem1-6, 6-1, 0-1
2024-10-25vs What the heck/Lewis/BurlingameWon 30
W#1 DoublesSanjeev Sinha / Nicholas Saquilayan vs Pinoe Chu / Mike Alcheck6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJoseph Nguyen / Scott Jen vs Todd Lewis / Shridharan Muthu6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTanumaya Tiwari / Ryan Kuo vs Craig Quan / Paul Swink6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.95 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Austin Tay
published 5
4.38
Sanjeev Sinha
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.34
Mark Dinh
published
4.15
Nicholas Saquilayan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.09
Nathan Gong
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.97
David Luu
published 4.5
3.96
Ricky Duong
published
3.61
Tanumaya Tiwari
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Brian Le
published 3.5
3.52
Ryan Kuo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jesse Terrel-Perez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Scott Jen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ricky Duong + David Luu213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Austin Tay
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sanjeev Sinha
6W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
4.38
Mark Dinh
17W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
4.34
Nicholas Saquilayan
10W–9L career · 1 line in 2024
14%85%1%
4.15
Nathan Gong
11W–12L career · 1 line in 2024
26%73%<1%
4.09
4.5
David Luu
15W–5L career · no lines in 2024
58%42%<1%
3.97
Ricky Duong
11W–4L career · no lines in 2024
60%40%<1%
3.96
Tanumaya Tiwari
6W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.61
3.5
Brian Le
41W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%38%62%
3.54
Ryan Kuo
13W–9L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%44%56%
3.52
Jesse Terrel-Perez
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Scott Jen
4W–0L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.