Teams

BBrown (Park Crossing)

2022 Adult 55 & Over League · 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.30 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-04-29vs KFoster (Weddington)Won 10
W#1 DoublesRhonda Cantrell / Sharon Storck vs Chris Marko / Barbara Northrup5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2022-04-22vs JNomina/Sanderson (OPRC)Split 11
W#1 DoublesCherie Bouchon / Sharon Storck vs Janice Abluton / Tina Hough6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMary Beth Faulkner / Ann Marie Selee vs Ruth Kelly / Jan Nomina4-6, 3-6
2022-04-15vs LCranford (Sardis)Won 20
W#1 DoublesRhonda Cantrell / Sharon Storck vs Cathy Culbertson / Laurie McCormick6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSuzanne Hair / Ann Marie Selee vs Cathie DeCramer / Deborah Jones6-3, 6-2
2022-04-01Won 10
W#3 DoublesAnn Marie Selee / Mary Beth Faulkner vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-03-25vs JGieker (Life Time)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesAllison Woerner / Sharon Storck vs Jeanine Flanagan / Wendi Peters2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesAnn Marie Selee / Mary Beth Faulkner vs Julie Gieker / Tammy Ramsay1-6, 1-6
2022-03-11vs COates (Charlotte Country Club)Split 11
L#1 DoublesTammy Ward / Sharon Storck vs Woodie Robinson / Nancy Carlton4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDiane Harrington / Ann Marie Selee vs Patricia Pollard / Mary Maund6-4, 6-3
2022-02-25vs KBowman (Weddington)Won 20
W#2 DoublesAllison Woerner / Sharon Storck vs Kathi Todd / Delane Lovelace6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAnn Marie Selee / Mary Beth Faulkner vs Karen Sterrett / Elizabeth Hollidge2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Tammy Ward
published
3.28
Sharon Storck
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.17
Diane Harrington
published 3.5
3.14
Cherie Bouchon
published 3.5
3.05
Rhonda Cantrell
published
2.97
Suzanne Hair
published
2.90
Allison Woerner
published 3
2.78
Ann Marie Selee
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Mary Beth Faulkner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allison Woerner + Cherie Bouchon123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tammy Ward
23W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Sharon Storck
97W–93L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Diane Harrington
6W–14L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%1%
3.17
3.5
Cherie Bouchon
5W–9L career · no lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
3.14
Rhonda Cantrell
4W–10L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.05
Suzanne Hair
4W–13L career · no lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
2.97
3
Allison Woerner
2W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Ann Marie Selee
39W–51L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.78
Mary Beth Faulkner
6W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.