Teams

Mohrman/Hi-Tri

2025 Tri-Level 18 & Over · Women 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 4.50 / ST. LOUIS

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-29vs STL/Gregory/Hi-TriLost 12
L#1 DoublesHeather Brinkman / Alexis Woodman vs Erin Swaller / Sampada Coster5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDawn Woodman / Victoria Zielinski vs Erica Peterson / Aya Finley6-1, 0-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSarah Wedick / Wendy Yang vs Wan-In Koo / Margaret Nosic6-7, 1-3
2025-07-26vs STL/Gregory/Hi-TriLost 03
L#1 DoublesJennifer Mckeown / Bekah Anderson vs Jennifer Gadsky / Melissa Hoyos5-7, 1-3
L#2 DoublesDawn Woodman / Brittany Mohrman vs Meg Gregory / Severine Huchet0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBecky Hall / Wendy Yang vs Elisa Nunez / Susan Nunez1-6, 2-6
2025-07-22vs STL/Gregory/Hi-TriWon 20
W#1 DoublesBekah Anderson / Alexis Woodman vs Jennifer Gadsky / Beatriz Juan Miranzo6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesVictoria Zielinski / Miranda Lopez vs Meg Gregory / Emily Cimarolli4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-07-19vs STL/Gregory/Hi-TriLost 12
L#1 DoublesBekah Anderson / Jennifer Mckeown vs Jennifer Gadsky / Melissa Hoyos5-7, 1-3
L#2 DoublesBrittany Mohrman / Dawn Woodman vs Meg Gregory / Severine Huchet0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSarah Wedick / Wendy Yang vs Margaret Nosic / Wan-In Koo6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2025-07-01vs STL/Gregory/Hi-TriWon 21
L#1 DoublesAlexis Woodman / Heather Brinkman vs Erin Swaller / Beatriz Juan Miranzo2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTrinity Lopez / Dawn Woodman vs Emily Cimarolli / Mila Bey6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesWendy Yang / Sarah Wedick vs Cajal Sumino / Wan-In Koo7-5, 6-3
2025-06-28vs STL/Gregory/Hi-TriWon 20
W#2 DoublesBrittany Mohrman / Trinity Lopez vs Emily Cimarolli / Meg Gregory6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBecky Hall / Sarah Wedick vs Wan-In Koo / Margaret Nosic6-4, 6-1
2025-06-21vs STL/Gregory/Hi-TriLost 03
L#1 DoublesHeather Brinkman / Jennifer Mckeown vs Sampada Coster / Melissa Hoyos7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBrittany Mohrman / Dawn Woodman vs Severine Huchet / Erica Peterson6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesWendy Yang / Becky Hall vs Susan Nunez / Elisa Nunez4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.11 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Bekah Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.46
Trinity Lopez
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
4.42
Victoria Zielinski
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
4.34
Miranda Lopez
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.18
Dawn Woodman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.13
Alexis Woodman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.03
Brittany Mohrman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.02
Heather Brinkman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Becky Hall
published 4
3.69
Sarah Wedick
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published
3.68
Wendy Yang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jennifer Mckeown
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Miranda Lopez + Trinity Lopez24663% games+3.9% vs expected
Dawn Woodman + Brittany Mohrman2540% games−5.8% vs expected
Dawn Woodman + Alexis Woodman314 matchesnot enough data
Wendy Yang + Sarah Wedick213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Bekah Anderson
4W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Trinity Lopez
169W–51L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
4.46
Victoria Zielinski
124W–34L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
4.42
Miranda Lopez
139W–70L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
4.34
4.5
Dawn Woodman
33W–22L career · 5 lines in 2025
9%91%1%
4.18
4.5
Alexis Woodman
7W–4L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
4.13
4.5
Brittany Mohrman
40W–28L career · 4 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
4.03
4.5
Heather Brinkman
22W–14L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
4.02
4
Becky Hall
36W–16L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Wedick
80W–43L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.69
Wendy Yang
114W–94L career · 5 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.68
Jennifer Mckeown
5W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.