Teams

BAY CLUB PL 18MX7.0A

2024 MIXED 18&Over · 18&Over MX7.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-03-23vs CROW CANYON CC 18MX7.0AWon 10
W#2 DoublesDattu Akella / Vanya Georgieva vs Peter Houston / Lisa Henderson6-2, 6-1
2024-03-08vs GREENBROOK RS 18MX7.0AWon 10
W#2 DoublesVanya Georgieva / Dattu Akella vs Amy Burrill / Juan Garrahan6-3, 6-4
2024-02-25vs GREENBROOK RS 18MX7.0AWon 10
W#3 DoublesDattu Akella / Mary J Bedegi vs James Powers / Beth Topor6-4, 6-2
2024-01-29Won 10
W#1 DoublesDattu Akella / Vanya Georgieva vs Jeb Horton / Kathryn Robert3-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18&Over MX7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
3.51
3.37
Jenny Mau
published
3.33
Daisy Maron
published 3.5
3.33
Michelle Hu
published
3.27
Dattu Akella
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Crawford Carpenter
published 3.5
3.18
Tina Zhao
published
3.09
Vanya Georgieva
published
3.06
Mehak Chopra
published
3.04
Priscilla Z Behidj
published
3.03
Jason Kight
published
2.96
Mary J Bedegi
published
2.86
Samy Tolaymat
published
Juraj Svec
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daisy Maron + Dattu Akella213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Parshudar Poonamallee Kothandaraman
30W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%2%98%
3.79
4
Andres de Argumaniz
1W–5L career · type M · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
Sreekanth Gannavarapu
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
3.51
Jenny Mau
11W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Daisy Maron
6W–12L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
Michelle Hu
17W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Dattu Akella
53W–35L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Crawford Carpenter
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tina Zhao
17W–4L career · no lines in 2024
9%89%1%
3.18
Vanya Georgieva
8W–8L career · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.09
Mehak Chopra
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
34%65%<1%
3.06
Priscilla Z Behidj
35W–30L career · no lines in 2024
<1%38%62%
3.04
Jason Kight
6W–13L career · no lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.03
Mary J Bedegi
8W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
2.96
Samy Tolaymat
2W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
2.86
Juraj Svec
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.