Teams

CAMPBELL

2024 SOUTH EAST TENNIS ADULT 55 & OVER · WOMEN 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-04-22vs GILBERTLost 01
L#3 DoublesLynn Gore / Elizabeth Gardner vs Lisa Phelps / Lisa Elsberry6-1, 5-7, 0-1
2024-04-17vs Hawkins (Day)Won 10
W#3 DoublesLynn Gore / Elizabeth Gardner vs Kathleen Hawkins / Sandy Foster6-0, 6-2
2024-03-25vs Haskins 55Won 10
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Gardner / Barbara Taylor vs Hilary Cole / Kathy Drake3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-03-13vs Hawkins (Day)Won 10
W#1 DoublesValerie Schaffer / Elizabeth Gardner vs Margaret Coco / Holly Robinson7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Lynn Gore
published
3.91
Loretta Lestrange
published
3.79
Julie Cooke
published
3.77
Dawn Lynch
published 4
Barbara Costa
published 4
3.74
Candy Garrett
published 4
3.73
Elizabeth Gardner
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.69
Sue Griffin
published
3.67
Debra Jones
published 4
Karyn Shane
published
Lynne Loccisano
published
Martha Broadbent
published
Valerie Schaffer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynn Gore + Loretta Lestrange6260% games−3.8% vs expected
Lynn Gore + Julie Cooke3261% gamesnot enough data
Dawn Lynch + Loretta Lestrange224 matchesnot enough data
Debra Jones + Julie Cooke213 matchesnot enough data
Lynn Gore + Elizabeth Gardner033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lynn Gore
14W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%24%
3.91
Loretta Lestrange
11W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.91
Julie Cooke
27W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Dawn Lynch
11W–14L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Barbara Costa
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Elizabeth van Noordt
5W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Candy Garrett
23W–18L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%2%
3.74
4
Elizabeth Gardner
130W–146L career · 4 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.73
Sue Griffin
8W–3L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Debra Jones
28W–19L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.67
Karyn Shane
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lynne Loccisano
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Martha Broadbent
10W–12L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Valerie Schaffer
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.