Teams

GILBERT

2024 SOUTH EAST TENNIS ADULT 55 & OVER · WOMEN 4.0

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-05-04vs FURR/DURHAMWon 10
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Palmer / Kathleen Timberlake vs Deedee Greene / Debbie Trafton6-1, 6-1
2024-04-29vs Hawkins (Day)Won 10
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Palmer / Kathleen Timberlake vs Debbie Canty / Jennifer Hartnett6-2, 7-5
2024-04-22vs CAMPBELLWon 10
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Palmer / Kathleen Timberlake vs Barbara Costa / Loretta Lestrange7-5, 6-2
2024-04-17vs Haskins 55Won 10
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Palmer / Kathleen Timberlake vs Angie Coats / Hilary Cole6-4, 6-2
2024-04-08vs O'Connell SJP DAYWon 10
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Palmer / Kathleen Timberlake vs Karen Fania / Kelli Brownfield3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-03-29vs Hawkins (Day)Won 10
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Palmer / Kathleen Timberlake vs Kathleen Hawkins / Margaret Varga-Roberson6-0, 6-1
2024-03-16vs CAMPBELLLost 01
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Palmer / Kathleen Timberlake vs Barbara Costa / Loretta Lestrange4-6, 5-7
2024-03-13vs Haskins 55Won 10
W#1 DoublesKathleen Timberlake / Elizabeth Palmer vs Lisa Graham / Kathleen Glancy6-3, 6-3
2024-03-04vs O'Connell SJP DAYWon 10
W#3 DoublesKathleen Timberlake / Elizabeth Palmer vs Peggy O'Connell / Karen Fania6-2, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Lisa Elsberry
published
3.92
Lee Ann Zierenberg
published
3.90
Kathleen Timberlake
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.88
Lisa Phelps
published
Adair Wright
published 4
3.72
Diana Rode
published 4
3.58
Lisa Sottung
published
3.55
Terri Meier
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lee Ann Zierenberg + Diana Rode5261% games+11.8% vs expected
Lisa Phelps + Lisa Sottung123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Elsberry
7W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%21%79%
4.12
Lee Ann Zierenberg
35W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.92
4
Kathleen Timberlake
158W–61L career · 14 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.90
Lisa Phelps
5W–12L career · no lines in 2024
81%19%<1%
3.88
4
Adair Wright
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Diana Rode
18W–14L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
Lisa Sottung
43W–32L career · no lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.58
Terri Meier
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.55

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.