Teams

55+ 9.0 Gemme

2022 55&Over Men · 9.0

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-09-06vs Northern: Bologna 9.0 MenSplit 11
W#1 DoublesWilliam DeSantis / Dennis McGuire vs Patrick Bologna / James Axford6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRaymond Gemme / Donald McGoldrick vs Michael Dorsey / Robert Farley3-6, 2-6
2022-07-27vs Northern: Bologna 9.0 MenLost 03
L#1 DoublesMark Culotti / Donald McGoldrick vs Michael Dorsey / Jeffrey Mastro2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesWilliam DeSantis / Dennis McGuire vs Robert Farley / Thomas Schmitz6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRaymond Gemme / Mike Gioia vs Patrick Bologna / James Axford1-6, 1-6
2022-07-16vs Northern: Bologna 9.0 MenLost 12
L#1 DoublesDennis McGuire / Donald McGoldrick vs James Axford / Michael Dorsey2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMike Gioia / William DeSantis vs Jeffrey Mastro / Robert Farley6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesRaymond Gemme / Terry Casillo vs Jeff Strong / Dylan Davis1-6, 2-6
2022-07-09vs Northern: Bologna 9.0 MenLost 03
L#1 DoublesWilliam DeSantis / Dennis McGuire vs Jeff Strong / Dylan Davis0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMike Gioia / Mark Culotti vs Patrick Bologna / Thomas Schmitz0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRaymond Gemme / Donald McGoldrick vs Michael Dorsey / Jeffrey Mastro0-6, 3-6
2022-06-18vs Northern: Bologna 9.0 MenLost 02
L#1 DoublesRaymond Gemme / Terry Casillo vs Jeff Strong / Dylan Davis1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMike Gioia / Mark Culotti vs Patrick Bologna / James Axford6-4, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Dennis McGuire
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
Donald McGoldrick
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
Mark Culotti
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Mike Gioia
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Raymond Gemme
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Terry Casillo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
William DeSantis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donald McGoldrick + Dennis McGuire3551% gamesnot enough data
Mike Gioia + Mark Culotti0632% gamesnot enough data
Mike Gioia + Donald McGoldrick2338% gamesnot enough data
Dennis McGuire + William DeSantis123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dennis McGuire
17W–18L career · type S · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Donald McGoldrick
12W–20L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mark Culotti
4W–23L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mike Gioia
7W–18L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Raymond Gemme
1W–8L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Terry Casillo
8W–30L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
William DeSantis
17W–18L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.