Teams

Berreth Tri-Level 55s 3.0/3.5/4.0W

2022 Piedmont Tri-Level 55 & Over · 3.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Ann Evans
published 4
3.69
Libby Strickland
published
3.67
Mimi Cartee
published
3.61
Marian Hogan
published
3.60
Carolyn Pellerin
published 4
3.37
Marsha Tice
published
3.35
Tammie Hughes
published
3.31
Linda Hestenes
published
3.28
Krisla Berreth
published
3.26
Trisha Kirby
published
3.18
Britt Molitoris
published 3.5
2.65
Mariann Van Ryen
published
Janel Green
published
Kelly Pryzwansky
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ann Evans
24W–17L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
Libby Strickland
128W–110L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Mimi Cartee
17W–17L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.67
Marian Hogan
128W–54L career · no lines in 2022
<1%21%79%
3.61
4
Carolyn Pellerin
8W–5L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.60
Marsha Tice
20W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
3.37
Tammie Hughes
23W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.35
Linda Hestenes
21W–16L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
Krisla Berreth
24W–16L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
Trisha Kirby
7W–7L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Britt Molitoris
8W–17L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.18
Mariann Van Ryen
121W–99L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
2.65
Janel Green
18W–11L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kelly Pryzwansky
15W–12L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.