Teams

PC-Deucebags

2025 Coed Social League · 6.0 Coed

6 players · average NTRP 3.08 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-09-28vs YTC-Backhanded ComplimentsSplit 22
L#1 Female DoublesRebecca Hiles / Heather Weber vs Judi Harris / Lisa Watkins4-6
L#1 Female SinglesHeather Weber vs Megan Jacobson3-6
W#1 Male DoublesLawrence Shepherd / John Hilmes vs Anthony Solorio / Steve Wolcott6-0
W#1 Male SinglesKaleb Harvey vs Anthony Solorio6-5
2025-09-27vs YTC-Deuce BagsSplit 22
L#1 Female DoublesRebecca Hiles / Heather Weber vs Amy Karau / Valerie Hull5-6
L#1 Female SinglesHeather Weber vs Pamela Urquhart2-6
W#1 Male DoublesLawrence Shepherd / John Hilmes vs Eric Hull / Fred Karau6-2
W#1 Male SinglesKaleb Harvey vs Jake Bradshaw6-4
2025-09-27vs YTC-Ace of HopsLost 14
L#1 Female DoublesRebecca Hiles / Heather Weber vs Kayla Robins / Brittany Bemis4-6
L#1 Female SinglesRebecca Hiles vs Jacqueline Degrasse2-6
L#1 Male DoublesLawrence Shepherd / John Hilmes vs Seth Robins / Jeff Ketcham4-6
L#1 Male SinglesJohn Hilmes vs Ryan Inouye4-6
W#1 Mixed DoublesRebecca Hiles / Kaleb Harvey vs Brittany Bemis / Ryan Inouye6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 6.0 Coed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1YTC-Ace of Hops03117783
2YTC-Deuce Bags0399979
3PC-Deucebags038101086
4YTC-Backhanded Compliments038101090

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Mauri Morgan
published 3
2.95
Kaleb Harvey
usually #1 Male Singles 67%, also #1 Mixed Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.90
John Hilmes
usually #1 Male Doubles 67%, also #1 Male Singles 33% · published 3
2.79
Lawrence Shepherd
usually #1 Male Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Rebecca Hiles
usually #1 Female Doubles 67%, also #1 Female Singles 33% · published 3
2.47
Heather Weber
usually #1 Female Singles 67%, also #1 Female Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lawrence Shepherd + Rebecca Hiles2354% games−0.9% vs expected
John Hilmes + Heather Weber2840% games−6.0% vs expected
Lawrence Shepherd + John Hilmes213 matchesnot enough data
Heather Weber + Rebecca Hiles033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Mauri Morgan
39W–28L career · no lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
3.5
Kaleb Harvey
21W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
2.95
3
John Hilmes
66W–53L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Lawrence Shepherd
17W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Rebecca Hiles
24W–33L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.75
3
Heather Weber
22W–49L career · 3 lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
2.47

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.