Teams

Teton Net

2025 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER · Ladies 4.0 - 18 & OVER

8 players · average NTRP 3.92 / WYOMING

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-04-27vs Colorado CrewLost 02
L#1 DoublesRenee Havens / Debbie Heimbouch vs April Walden / Amy Anderson4-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesMiyuki Chovanetz vs Nancy Kepner6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2025-04-27vs Colorado CrewWon 21
W#1 DoublesTami DeGrosky / Renee Havens vs Amy Anderson / Dierdre Sadeh6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMiyuki Chovanetz / Alison Earnhart vs Haley Hasler / Julia Tynan6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDebbie Heimbouch / Kelly Milligan vs Kelsey Nosler / April Walden5-7, 4-6
2025-04-26vs Colorado CrewLost 12
L#1 DoublesLinda Merigliano / Debbie Heimbouch vs Patti Helper / April Walden3-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesRenee Havens vs Daisha Thompson5-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMiyuki Chovanetz / Alison Earnhart vs Dierdre Sadeh / Rachel Robertson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ladies 4.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Miranda Hoover
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Debbie Heimbouch
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.71
Alison Earnhart
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.62
Linda Merigliano
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.42
Tami DeGrosky
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.40
Kelly Milligan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Miyuki Chovanetz
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Renee Havens
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Miyuki Chovanetz + Alison Earnhart404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Miranda Hoover
29W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Debbie Heimbouch
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Alison Earnhart
71W–48L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Linda Merigliano
49W–76L career · 3 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.62
4
Tami DeGrosky
4W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
3.42
3.5
Kelly Milligan
38W–35L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
Miyuki Chovanetz
3W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Renee Havens
11W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.