Teams

Colorado Crew

2025 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER · Ladies 4.0 - 18 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / WYOMING

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-27Won 10
W#2 DoublesKelsey Nosler / Rachel Robertson vs Linda Merigliano / Tami DeGrosky5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2025-04-26vs Teton NetLost 01
L#3 DoublesDierdre Sadeh / Rachel Robertson vs Miyuki Chovanetz / Alison Earnhart6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · Ladies 4.0 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Colorado Crew2110513140

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Meredith Lorick
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.93
April Walden
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.78
Daisha Thompson
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.76
Patti Helper
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.72
Julia Tynan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Rachel Robertson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.71
Dierdre Sadeh
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.58
Nancy Kepner
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.48
Haley Hasler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.44
Kelsey Nosler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patti Helper + April Walden331157% games+4.8% vs expected
Julia Tynan + Kelsey Nosler22857% games+4.8% vs expected
Julia Tynan + Haley Hasler181356% games+0.2% vs expected
Dierdre Sadeh + Kelsey Nosler2545% games−0.1% vs expected
Dierdre Sadeh + Julia Tynan1451% games−3.6% vs expected
Julia Tynan + April Walden2642% games−6.5% vs expected
Patti Helper + Dierdre Sadeh5355% games−9.3% vs expected
Dierdre Sadeh + April Walden81248% games−12.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Meredith Lorick
101W–47L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
4.04
4
April Walden
102W–76L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.93
4
Daisha Thompson
21W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Patti Helper
70W–45L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Julia Tynan
84W–50L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%94%2%
3.72
Rachel Robertson
38W–67L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%94%2%
3.72
4
Dierdre Sadeh
67W–86L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Nancy Kepner
31W–41L career · 2 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.58
4
Haley Hasler
122W–105L career · 3 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
3.48
4
Kelsey Nosler
94W–55L career · 2 lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
3.44

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.