Teams

RCCB - Wells

2024 Brevard Trilevel · 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.12 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-08-07vs Fee - LuerWon 10
W#1 DoublesTee Wells / Debra Wohlert vs Stacy Engel / Katharyn Luer7-5, 6-2
2024-07-17vs Fee - LuerWon 10
W#1 DoublesTee Wells / Susan Douglas vs Leslie Love / Katharyn Luer6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBeverly Gibbs / Mary Stoops vs Megan Holthaus / Kerry Sawyer0-6, 1-6
2024-07-03vs Suntree - FordSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTee Wells / Susan Douglas vs SARA BRESETTE / Darien Lawrence7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBeverly Gibbs / June Leiter vs Sharon Ford / Caroline Jiborn3-6, 2-6
2024-06-26vs Fee - LuerWon 10
W#2 DoublesXu Sue Huang / Beverly Gibbs vs Leslie Love / Renee Jiannine2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-06-12vs Suntree - FordWon 10
W#1 DoublesTee Wells / Susan Douglas vs Dana Saunders / Beverly McCullar6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Tee Wells
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Xu Sue Huang
published
3.11
Janine Brunkala
published
2.96
Beverly Gibbs
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.94
Melissa Vickers
published
2.85
June Leiter
published
2.73
Debra Wohlert
published 3
2.72
Allison Moorhead
published 3
2.44
Faith Torcuator
published
Joanne Ringrose
published
Mary Stoops
published
Mindy Levine
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Tee Wells
129W–96L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%92%4%
3.26
Xu Sue Huang
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.12
Janine Brunkala
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.11
3
Beverly Gibbs
74W–43L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
2.96
Melissa Vickers
20W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
2.94
June Leiter
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
87%13%<1%
2.85
3
Debra Wohlert
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Allison Moorhead
11W–5L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.72
Faith Torcuator
21W–23L career · no lines in 2024
0%67%33%
2.44
Joanne Ringrose
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mary Stoops
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mindy Levine
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.