Teams

Suntree - Ford

2024 Brevard Trilevel · 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.17 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#1 DoublesBeverly McCullar / Ann Passmore vs Jennifer Oglesby / Beth Wolfram4-6, 5-7
2024-07-27vs Fee - LuerWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnn Passmore / SARA BRESETTE vs Lauren Ranew / Stacy Engel7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSARA BRESETTE / Darien Lawrence vs Morgan Bentley / Diana Hayslip6-4, 7-6
2024-07-03vs RCCB - WellsLost 01
L#1 DoublesSARA BRESETTE / Darien Lawrence vs Tee Wells / Susan Douglas7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesNancy Charitat / Beverly McCullar vs Jennifer Oglesby / Catherine Grainger6-3, 0-6, 0-1
2024-06-19vs Fee - LuerLost 02
L#1 DoublesSARA BRESETTE / Dana Saunders vs Lauren Ranew / Emily Criste3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSharon Ford / Sacha Armstrong vs Katharyn Luer / Leslie Love0-6, 2-6
2024-06-12vs RCCB - WellsWon 10
W#2 DoublesAnastasia Mika / Nancy Hastings vs June Leiter / Xu Sue Huang6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Ann Passmore
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.24
SARA BRESETTE
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.21
Nancy Charitat
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.18
Dana Saunders
published 3.5
3.15
Darien Lawrence
published 3.5
2.99
Sacha Armstrong
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.88
Anastasia Mika
published 3
2.87
Nancy Hastings
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.78
Chrissy James
published 3
2.64
Caroline Jiborn
published 3
2.53
JANETTE TABOR
published
2.48
Maria Reza
published
2.28
Deborah Tuttle
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Charitat + Ann Passmore18364% games+0.9% vs expected
Ann Passmore + SARA BRESETTE4649% games−4.1% vs expected
Deborah Tuttle + Maria Reza213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ann Passmore
135W–97L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%88%12%
3.33
3.5
SARA BRESETTE
102W–75L career · 7 lines in 2024
4%92%3%
3.24
Nancy Charitat
101W–49L career · 2 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Dana Saunders
11W–17L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Darien Lawrence
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.15
Sacha Armstrong
42W–28L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Anastasia Mika
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Nancy Hastings
108W–120L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
Chrissy James
10W–5L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Caroline Jiborn
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
15%84%1%
2.64
JANETTE TABOR
6W–7L career · no lines in 2024
0%41%59%
2.53
Maria Reza
14W–4L career · no lines in 2024
0%56%44%
2.48
2.5
Deborah Tuttle
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
0%94%6%
2.28

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.