Teams

WH McMullen FWL A18-4.0WW

2022 WMI FWL USTA League Adult 18&Over Weekend Leagues · WMI FWL A18&O 4.0 WW (8 player)

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / WESTERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-01-29vs MVR Baines FWL A18-4.0WWLost 12
L#1 DoublesJulie Kennedy / Tatiana Holmgren vs Jennifer Aleccia / Jennie Wassenaar2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMarjori Cantwell vs Debbie Buchan3-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesAudrey Saliga vs Dawn Wolownik6-2, 6-0
2022-01-16vs MVC Diedrich FWL A18-4.0WWLost 12
L#1 DoublesTonia Shoup / Diane Konwinski vs Laurie Scott / Ruth Kohley4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 SinglesBansili Desai vs Brittnee Tomlin2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAudrey Saliga / Julie Kennedy vs Sherri Lawrence / Michelle Madden6-0, 6-4
2021-12-19vs ML Mueller FWL A18-4.0WWWon 21
W#1 DoublesMarjori Cantwell / Diane Konwinski vs Lindsey Robinson / Emi Mueller7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTonia Shoup / Audrey Saliga vs Maureen Saxton / Alexandra Stamm-Cross6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesTatiana Holmgren / Julie Kennedy vs Mary Ellen Ott / Jennifer Brown0-6, 4-6
2021-11-20vs PA Kienast FWL A18-4.0WWLost 14
L#1 DoublesMichelle Molitor / Tonia Shoup vs Julie Kienast / Jennifer Kok6-7, 0-6
L#1 SinglesBansili Desai vs Jennifer Amante3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAudrey Saliga / Sandy Doroh vs Yunju Lee / Paula Tupper3-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesJalynn Schnr vs Katelyn Dykema6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesTatiana Holmgren / Julie Kennedy vs Suzette Sanchez / Yvonne Boucher4-6, 4-6
2021-10-30vs MY Rajkovich FWL A18-4.0WWLost 12
L#1 DoublesDiane Konwinski / Tonia Shoup vs Jennifer Dougherty / Anne Rajkovich1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesBansili Desai vs Carol Heinicke7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMichelle Molitor / Tatiana Holmgren vs Diane Dirette / Lauren Worgess0-6, 3-6
2021-10-23vs COE Musser FWL A18-4.0WWSplit 22
W#1 DoublesSandy Doroh / Audrey Saliga vs Diana Bock / Julie Zdybel1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesBansili Desai vs Julie Ludden3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTatiana Holmgren / Julie Kennedy vs Alicia Musser / Barbara Clauer4-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesJalynn Schnr vs Sheryl Wilson2-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · WMI FWL A18&O 4.0 WW (8 player)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MVR Baines FWL A18-4.0WW602827152
2ML Mueller FWL A18-4.0WW51171331227
3PA Kienast FWL A18-4.0WW33151532239
4MVC Diedrich FWL A18-4.0WW33141637269
5MY Rajkovich FWL A18-4.0WW33131737267
6COE Musser FWL A18-4.0WW1592145307
7WH McMullen FWL A18-4.0WW0692145309

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Audrey Saliga
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
Bansili Desai
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.72
Marjori Cantwell
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.65
Jalynn Schnr
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.63
Michelle Molitor
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.42
Diane Konwinski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Sandy Doroh
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
3.18
Julie McMullen
published
3.13
Tatiana Holmgren
usually #2 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published
2.98
Julie Kennedy
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Tonia Shoup
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tatiana Holmgren + Sandy Doroh4263% games+3.4% vs expected
Tatiana Holmgren + Julie Kennedy4646% games−0.5% vs expected
Marjori Cantwell + Michelle Molitor71049% games−3.3% vs expected
Diane Konwinski + Tonia Shoup2344% gamesnot enough data
Tatiana Holmgren + Jalynn Schnr314 matchesnot enough data
Audrey Saliga + Sandy Doroh123 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Molitor + Tonia Shoup123 matchesnot enough data
Julie Kennedy + Sandy Doroh213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Audrey Saliga
57W–66L career · 5 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
4.24
4
Bansili Desai
54W–28L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Marjori Cantwell
139W–100L career · 2 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Jalynn Schnr
102W–90L career · 3 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
Michelle Molitor
86W–72L career · 2 lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.63
3.5
Diane Konwinski
43W–27L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.42
Sandy Doroh
91W–57L career · 10 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Julie McMullen
15W–24L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
Tatiana Holmgren
46W–60L career · 11 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.13
Julie Kennedy
42W–64L career · 7 lines in 2022
55%45%<1%
2.98
Tonia Shoup
16W–22L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.