Teams

MY Rajkovich FWL A18-4.0WW

2022 WMI FWL USTA League Adult 18&Over Weekend Leagues · WMI FWL A18&O 4.0 WW (8 player)

11 players · average NTRP 3.83 / WESTERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-12-04vs MVR Baines FWL A18-4.0WWLost 13
L#1 DoublesTambra Ford / Lauren Worgess vs Michele Ferenchick / Jane Everhart2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesTricia Piereson vs Dawn Wolownik1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRonda Stafford / Carol Heinicke vs Jennifer Aleccia / Teresa Gaudino6-1, 0-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDiane Dirette / Patricia Wright vs Patricia Mester / Julie Russell6-7, 5-7
2021-11-20vs COE Musser FWL A18-4.0WWWon 41
W#1 DoublesRonda Stafford / Lauren Worgess vs Barbara Clauer / Julie Ludden6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesCarol Heinicke vs Holly Kuhl7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDiane Dirette / Patricia Wright vs Nancy Corner / Rachel Maas6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAnne Rajkovich vs Sheryl Wilson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGlorianna Fogarty / Alisha Marvin vs Jill McGeachy / Kathleen Stockall7-5, 6-3
2021-11-06vs ML Mueller FWL A18-4.0WWLost 12
L#1 DoublesDiane Dirette / Carol Heinicke vs Maureen Saxton / Lindsey Robinson1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLauren Worgess / Anne Rajkovich vs Julia Cawood / Renae Almasy6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesTricia Piereson / Alisha Marvin vs Mary Ellen Ott / Soogee Ahn2-6, 3-6
2021-10-30vs WH McMullen FWL A18-4.0WWWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Dougherty / Anne Rajkovich vs Diane Konwinski / Tonia Shoup6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesCarol Heinicke vs Bansili Desai5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDiane Dirette / Lauren Worgess vs Michelle Molitor / Tatiana Holmgren6-0, 6-3
2021-10-09Split 11
W#1 DoublesAnne Rajkovich / Jennifer Dougherty vs Brittnee Tomlin / Laurie Scott7-5, 6-2
L#2 SinglesCarol Heinicke vs Ashley Diedrich5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · WMI FWL A18&O 4.0 WW (8 player)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MVR Baines FWL A18-4.0WW602827152
2ML Mueller FWL A18-4.0WW51171331227
3PA Kienast FWL A18-4.0WW33151532239
4MVC Diedrich FWL A18-4.0WW33141637269
5MY Rajkovich FWL A18-4.0WW33131737267
6COE Musser FWL A18-4.0WW1592145307
7WH McMullen FWL A18-4.0WW0692145309

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Tambra Ford
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.79
Kristin Bellino
published
3.74
Lauren Worgess
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.66
Ronda Stafford
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.63
Anne Rajkovich
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.59
Carol Heinicke
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 4
3.53
Alisha Marvin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.19
Diane Dirette
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.15
Glorianna Fogarty
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Jennifer Dougherty
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Tricia Piereson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Glorianna Fogarty + Alisha Marvin5547% games+10.0% vs expected
Anne Rajkovich + Ronda Stafford7261% games+9.5% vs expected
Anne Rajkovich + Lauren Worgess8455% games+8.9% vs expected
Jennifer Dougherty + Carol Heinicke9063% games+8.8% vs expected
Carol Heinicke + Ronda Stafford10948% games+8.4% vs expected
Alisha Marvin + Ronda Stafford4255% games+8.3% vs expected
Tambra Ford + Ronda Stafford121251% games+1.1% vs expected
Lauren Worgess + Ronda Stafford101050% games+1.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tambra Ford
177W–127L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.83
Kristin Bellino
21W–33L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.79
Lauren Worgess
55W–48L career · 4 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
Ronda Stafford
113W–147L career · 4 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.66
4
Anne Rajkovich
68W–60L career · 4 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.63
4
Carol Heinicke
117W–155L career · 7 lines in 2022
23%76%<1%
3.59
4
Alisha Marvin
51W–77L career · 4 lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
3.53
3.5
Diane Dirette
83W–147L career · 4 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Glorianna Fogarty
113W–227L career · 3 lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.15
Jennifer Dougherty
33W–15L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tricia Piereson
28W–23L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.