Teams

WP RED

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-07-21vs WP GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesKelli Pfaff / KATHERINE ANNE DEDRICK vs Laurie Wagner / Laura Lapsys6-7, 1-6
W#1 SinglesCindy Miller vs Terre Buckley6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesPolly Warner / Shawna Ramona vs Betty Evans / Samantha Spiwak6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesRobin Krakowsky / Kathryn Santoro vs Michelle Telfer / Karen Bent3-6, 0-6
2021-07-13vs DTC SILVERLost 04
L#1 DoublesBecky Adams / Kelly Costanzo vs Kimberly Montgomery / Laura Rogers2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKATHERINE ANNE DEDRICK vs Sarah Hart5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Pollman / Shawna Ramona vs Sheila Tsai / Krista Yamamoto0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesErin Dunn / Polly Warner vs JoEllen Legg / Kayla Hodges0-6, 1-6
2021-07-13vs GTC PINKLost 04
L#1 DoublesBecky Adams / Kelly Costanzo vs Pamela Zapotosky / Carrie Wysong4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesErin Dunn vs Tia Wolkov1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCindy Miller / Kelli Pfaff vs Bonnie Cleaver / Ann Rhoads1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesPolly Warner / Kathryn Santoro vs Meg Nguyen / Joyce Kennedy Raymes3-6, 2-6
2021-07-10vs CP BLUELost 04
L#1 DoublesPolly Warner / Shawna Ramona vs Becky Reimers / Barbara Worthington2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesErin Dunn vs Susan Golinvaux0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCindy Miller / Jennifer Pollman vs Elizabeth Walker / Kate Lively6-2, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKelli Pfaff / KATHERINE ANNE DEDRICK vs Melissa Farver / Sara McDonnell3-6, 1-6
2021-06-27vs EM REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesCindy Miller / Kelly Costanzo vs Janet Willson / Lisa Allen4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesBecky Adams vs Meg Overstake6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKelli Pfaff / Shawna Ramona vs Rebecca Winslow / Tiffany Sandusky2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKathryn Santoro / Robin Krakowsky vs Susan Engeman / Kristen Schiffner1-6, 2-6
2021-06-22vs CM REDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesBecky Adams / Kelly Costanzo vs Anne Doubet / Barbara McDuffie6-3, 7-6
L#1 SinglesCindy Miller vs Megan Robert3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJennifer Pollman / KATHERINE ANNE DEDRICK vs Margot Kelly / Jennifer Cook0-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesPolly Warner / Erin Dunn vs Beth Hasse / Kristin Seby6-3, 6-1
2021-06-15vs GTC REDLost 13
W#1 DoublesBecky Adams / Kelly Costanzo vs Leah Johnson / Julie Woodle6-3, 7-6
L#1 SinglesErin Dunn vs Jill St. John4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKATHERINE ANNE DEDRICK / Jennifer Pollman vs Brenda Emerson / Kari Coughlon2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRobin Krakowsky / Kathryn Santoro vs Crystal Cobb / Jessica Mills0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.61 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Cindy Miller
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.88
Becky Adams
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.81
Erin Dunn
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.65
Kelli Pfaff
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.58
KATHERINE ANNE DEDRICK
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.56
Polly Warner
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.26
Kelly Costanzo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.25
Jennifer Pollman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kathryn Santoro
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Shawna Ramona
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Becky Adams + Kelly Costanzo5453% games+1.1% vs expected
Kathryn Santoro + Polly Warner1536% games−12.7% vs expected
Jennifer Pollman + KATHERINE ANNE DEDRICK0534% gamesnot enough data
Polly Warner + Erin Dunn2343% gamesnot enough data
Cindy Miller + KATHERINE ANNE DEDRICK033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cindy Miller
15W–32L career · type A · 5 lines in 2021
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Becky Adams
45W–22L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Erin Dunn
31W–34L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
2.81
Kelli Pfaff
36W–33L career · 4 lines in 2021
12%87%<1%
2.65
3
KATHERINE ANNE DEDRICK
12W–37L career · type S · 5 lines in 2021
26%74%<1%
2.58
Polly Warner
43W–54L career · 5 lines in 2021
34%66%<1%
2.56
Kelly Costanzo
22W–70L career · 5 lines in 2021
97%3%<1%
2.26
Jennifer Pollman
24W–59L career · 4 lines in 2021
97%3%<1%
2.25
Kathryn Santoro
5W–15L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Shawna Ramona
4W–4L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.