Teams

EM RED

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.17 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-07-20vs GTC REDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesSusan Engeman / Kristen Schiffner vs Leah Johnson / Julie Woodle6-3, 6-0
L#1 SinglesCarol Grow vs Jill St. John1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Allen / Amy Pell vs Crystal Cobb / Brenda Emerson0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJll McLain / Heather Barben vs Jessica Mills / Barbara Lewis7-5, 6-1
2021-07-13vs CM REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesJll McLain / Janet Willson vs Anne Gordon / Megan Robert6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesCarol Grow vs Jennifer Cook5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesTiffany Sandusky / Rebecca Winslow vs Stephanie Sabga / Beth Hasse4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHeather Barben / Kristen Schiffner vs Hannah Sloven / Mary Hutchison7-5, 7-5
2021-07-06vs WP GREENWon 31
W#1 DoublesJll McLain / Janet Willson vs Susan Anderson / Michelle Telfer6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesCarol Grow vs Marissa Ogden3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKristen Schiffner / Susan Engeman vs Kathy MacDaniel / Laura Lapsys6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTiffany Sandusky / Joyce McClain vs Lisa Kutner / Karen Bent6-1, 6-1
2021-06-30vs GTC PINKLost 13
L#1 DoublesJll McLain / Rebecca Winslow vs Meg Nguyen / Ann Rhoads1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMeg Overstake vs Tia Wolkov0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCarol Grow / Susan Engeman vs Julie Groves / Carrie Wysong0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesTiffany Sandusky / Heather Barben vs Stephanie Gawler / Shelly Wesner6-0, 6-4
2021-06-27vs WP REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesJanet Willson / Lisa Allen vs Cindy Miller / Kelly Costanzo6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesMeg Overstake vs Becky Adams1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesRebecca Winslow / Tiffany Sandusky vs Kelli Pfaff / Shawna Ramona6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSusan Engeman / Kristen Schiffner vs Kathryn Santoro / Robin Krakowsky6-1, 6-2
2021-06-24vs CP BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesTiffany Sandusky / Janet Willson vs Kate Lively / Sara McDonnell0-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJll McLain vs Elizabeth Walker7-5, 6-0
L#2 DoublesHeather Barben / Joyce McClain vs Becky Reimers / Susan Golinvaux1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMeg Overstake / Amy Pell vs Courtney Kanouff / Jennifer Kandel3-6, 1-6
2021-06-22vs DTC SILVERLost 04
L#1 DoublesJll McLain / Rebecca Winslow vs Laura Rogers / JoEllen Legg4-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesAmy Pell vs Elisabeth Vezzani2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKristen Schiffner / Lisa Allen vs Natasha Gallaway / Kristin Bokelman6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJanet Willson / Joyce McClain vs Sheila Tsai / Krista Yamamoto1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Jll McLain
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 4
3.26
Tiffany Sandusky
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.65
Amy Pell
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.56
Carol Grow
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.50
Kristen Schiffner
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.50
Janet Willson
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.50
Susan Engeman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.27
Heather Barben
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Meg Overstake
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Rebecca Winslow
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meg Overstake + Rebecca Winslow4842% games−0.8% vs expected
Susan Engeman + Janet Willson2537% games−9.7% vs expected
Susan Engeman + Carol Grow1535% games−12.5% vs expected
Susan Engeman + Kristen Schiffner3260% gamesnot enough data
Jll McLain + Rebecca Winslow134 matchesnot enough data
Heather Barben + Tiffany Sandusky303 matchesnot enough data
Meg Overstake + Janet Willson123 matchesnot enough data
Janet Willson + Jll McLain303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jll McLain
133W–74L career · type A · 6 lines in 2021
10%90%1%
3.67
3.5
Tiffany Sandusky
92W–79L career · 5 lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.26
3
Amy Pell
29W–37L career · 3 lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
2.65
3
Carol Grow
21W–30L career · 4 lines in 2021
33%67%<1%
2.56
Kristen Schiffner
21W–34L career · 5 lines in 2021
48%52%<1%
2.50
Janet Willson
23W–39L career · 5 lines in 2021
49%51%<1%
2.50
3
Susan Engeman
31W–62L career · type A · 4 lines in 2021
52%48%<1%
2.50
2.5
Heather Barben
32W–28L career · 4 lines in 2021
0%96%4%
2.27
Meg Overstake
11W–27L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Rebecca Winslow
24W–30L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.