Teams

GEPTA/18&overMX/3.5/Castaneda/EPTC#2

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA MIXED 18 & OVER LEAGUE

14 players · average NTRP 3.25 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings8 teams · 2026 USA MIXED 18 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/Cisneros/18&over/3.5MX9020717193
2GEPTA/18&overMX/3.5/Castaneda/EPTC#28120720216
3GEPTA/18&overMX/3.5/Juarez/EPTC#56318923222
4GEPTA/18&overMX/3.5/Zamora/TW#145111634266
5GEPTA/18&overMX/3.5/Lopez/EPTC#335111332242
6GEPTA/18&overMX/3.5/Mirazo/EPCC2691533252
7GEPTA/18&overMX/3.5/Finn/TW#227111634254
8GEPTA/18&overMX/3.5/Estrada/EPTC#11852246292

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Daniela Cano
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published 3.5
2.81
Dennis Rodriguez
usually #1 Doubles 91%, also #2 Singles 9% · published 3
Enrique Mata
usually #2 Doubles 31%, also #3 Doubles 28% · published
Erika Avila
usually #1 Singles 48%, also #1 Doubles 24% · published
Humberto Cardiel
usually #2 Doubles 32%, also #3 Doubles 21% · published
Javier MacIas
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
Juan Becerra
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Julia Vera
usually #1 Singles 47%, also #3 Doubles 26% · published
Leslie Zaragoza
usually #2 Singles 27%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published
Martha Canales
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sergio Castaneda
usually #3 Doubles 24%, also #1 Singles 21% · published
Tatiana Fernandez
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published
Taylor Trippet
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Zaphnath Jaramillo
usually #1 Singles 42%, also #3 Doubles 21% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leslie Zaragoza + Erika Avila4153% gamesnot enough data
Sergio Castaneda + Humberto Cardiel1444% gamesnot enough data
Tatiana Fernandez + Enrique Mata213 matchesnot enough data
Tatiana Fernandez + Javier MacIas213 matchesnot enough data
Tatiana Fernandez + Sergio Castaneda213 matchesnot enough data
Daniela Cano + Zaphnath Jaramillo123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Daniela Cano
40W–21L career · 25 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.44
3
Dennis Rodriguez
45W–57L career · 11 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
Enrique Mata
56W–103L career · 27 lines in 2026
not enough data
Erika Avila
72W–37L career · 24 lines in 2026
not enough data
Humberto Cardiel
51W–62L career · 24 lines in 2026
not enough data
Javier MacIas
31W–19L career · 21 lines in 2026
not enough data
Juan Becerra
17W–21L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data
Julia Vera
22W–5L career · 19 lines in 2026
not enough data
Leslie Zaragoza
48W–48L career · 23 lines in 2026
not enough data
Martha Canales
59W–51L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sergio Castaneda
61W–81L career · 29 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tatiana Fernandez
51W–15L career · 34 lines in 2026
not enough data
Taylor Trippet
4W–5L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
Zaphnath Jaramillo
24W–41L career · 17 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.