GEPTA/18&overMX/3.5/Finn/TW#2

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA MIXED 18 & OVER LEAGUE

18 players · average NTRP 3.36 / GEPTA

Schedule

Flight standings8 teams · 2026 USA MIXED 18 & OVER LEAGUE

Team	W	L	Ind. W	Ind. L	Sets lost	Games lost
1GEPTA/Cisneros/18&over/3.5MX	9	0	20	7	17	193
2GEPTA/18&overMX/3.5/Castaneda/EPTC#2	8	1	20	7	20	216
3GEPTA/18&overMX/3.5/Juarez/EPTC#5	6	3	18	9	23	222
4GEPTA/18&overMX/3.5/Zamora/TW#1	4	5	11	16	34	266
5GEPTA/18&overMX/3.5/Lopez/EPTC#3	3	5	11	13	32	242
6GEPTA/18&overMX/3.5/Mirazo/EPCC	2	6	9	15	33	252
7GEPTA/18&overMX/3.5/Finn/TW#2	2	7	11	16	34	254
8GEPTA/18&overMX/3.5/Estrada/EPTC#1	1	8	5	22	46	292

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52

Erica McFarland

usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5

3.45

Gerardo Gomez

usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published 3.5

3.41

Ani Ramos

usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5

3.35

Hilda Finn

usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published 3.5

3.17

Daniel Trejo

usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 3.5

2.91

Ariana Guerrero

usually #1 Doubles 29%, also #2 Doubles 24% · published 3

2.77

Brettney Dee Wilcox

usually #1 Doubles 52%, also #3 Doubles 21% · published 3

—

Jennifer Bush

usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published —

—

Juana Lopez

usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published —

—

Ken O'Neal

usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published —

—

Laura Orozco

usually #3 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published —

—

Manouchehr Refaeian

usually #3 Doubles 47%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published —

—

Oren Belkin

usually #1 Doubles 52%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published —

—

Osvaldo Orozco

usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published —

—

Priscilla Gaona

usually #1 Singles 56%, also #2 Singles 28% · published —

—

Ricardo Ortiz

usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published —

—

Roberto Ochoa

usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published —

—

Trevor Hjalmquist

usually #1 Doubles 30%, also #1 Singles 26% · published —

Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Orozco + Osvaldo Orozco	3–7	38% games	not enough data
Jennifer Bush + Brettney Dee Wilcox	3–2	51% games	not enough data
Gerardo Gomez + Juana Lopez	5–0	67% games	not enough data
Oren Belkin + Brettney Dee Wilcox	2–3	48% games	not enough data
Laura Orozco + Hilda Finn	1–3	4 matches	not enough data
Ricardo Ortiz + Hilda Finn	0–4	4 matches	not enough data
Erica McFarland + Trevor Hjalmquist	2–1	3 matches	not enough data

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5

Erica McFarland

28W–16L career · 33 lines in 2026

<1%45%55%

3.52

3.5

Gerardo Gomez

72W–51L career · 27 lines in 2026

<1%66%34%

3.45

3.5

Ani Ramos

29W–28L career · 7 lines in 2026

<1%76%24%

3.41

3.5

Hilda Finn

83W–95L career · 32 lines in 2026

<1%87%13%

3.35

3.5

Daniel Trejo

39W–39L career · 11 lines in 2026

10%90%1%

3.17

Ariana Guerrero

30W–19L career · 19 lines in 2026

<1%75%25%

2.91

Brettney Dee Wilcox

48W–44L career · 29 lines in 2026

2%94%4%

2.77

—

Jennifer Bush

67W–81L career · 21 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Juana Lopez

63W–23L career · 32 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Ken O'Neal

11W–45L career · 5 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Laura Orozco

52W–108L career · 17 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Manouchehr Refaeian

109W–95L career · 35 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Oren Belkin

47W–45L career · 21 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Osvaldo Orozco

40W–56L career · 15 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Priscilla Gaona

20W–31L career · 32 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Ricardo Ortiz

27W–69L career · 14 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Roberto Ochoa

5W–18L career · 15 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Trevor Hjalmquist

21W–10L career · 22 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.