Teams

FLYTE RC 40AM4.5A

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Men's 4.5

19 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Men's 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.95 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Kevin Keenley
published
4.28
Geoffrey Gerding
published
4.22
Caben Chester
published 4.5
4.13
Olivier Picault
published
4.13
David Erlich
published 4.5
4.10
Robert Herbst
published
4.09
Sacha Drazien
published
4.07
Jonathan Lefferts
published
3.99
William Dagley
published
3.81
Leo Bersamina
published
3.79
Thomas Schmidt
published
3.72
Tommy Hellyer
published
3.68
Jason Holmes
published
3.67
Samuel Pleasure
published
3.62
Thomas Chang
published
3.56
William Chamberlin
published
Favio de Marco
published
Jeffery Birkenseer
published
Yoram Tal
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jason Holmes + David Erlich213 matchesnot enough data
Sacha Drazien + Olivier Picault303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kevin Keenley
6W–1L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
4.29
Geoffrey Gerding
13W–11L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
4.28
4.5
Caben Chester
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
4.22
Olivier Picault
16W–5L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
4.13
4.5
David Erlich
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
4.13
Robert Herbst
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
4.10
Sacha Drazien
15W–7L career · no lines in 2025
26%73%<1%
4.09
Jonathan Lefferts
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
4.07
William Dagley
2W–9L career · no lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.99
Leo Bersamina
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
Thomas Schmidt
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
93%7%<1%
3.79
Tommy Hellyer
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Jason Holmes
17W–9L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Samuel Pleasure
13W–9L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Thomas Chang
9W–7L career · no lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.62
William Chamberlin
11W–9L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.56
Favio de Marco
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jeffery Birkenseer
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Yoram Tal
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.