Teams

LHRE-REITER/WESTPORT

2022 Lake USTA 55 & Over League · Women 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.15 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-11Won 10
W#2 DoublesJoanne Empey Rodriguez / Sandra Stinson vs Kathy Weitzel / Cathy Leitch6-3, 6-2
2022-05-07vs LKKaake/Holbrook 30Split 11
L#2 DoublesZahra Simonetti / Brenda Clay vs Cindy Long / Ilieva Ageenko4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesShirley Pirkl / Kathleen Stiffler vs Kathleen Kaake / Gail Quinlan6-0, 6-1
2022-04-22vs LKKaake/Holbrook 30Lost 02
L#1 DoublesAngela Jakeway / Zahra Simonetti vs Karen Cooper / Melinda Little6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJeri Ames / Holly Reiter vs Jennifer Ashford / Beth Welch7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2022-04-15Won 10
W#3 DoublesHolly Reiter / Angela Jakeway vs Elizabeth Davis / Margaret Arnot6-1, 6-0
2022-04-01vs LKKaake/Holbrook 30Split 11
W#2 DoublesZahra Simonetti / Brenda Clay vs Patty Howe / Patrice Hurt6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesConnie Mathis / Angela Jakeway vs Karen Burr / Melinda Little3-6, 4-6
2022-03-25Won 30
W#1 DoublesMeagan Palmer / Kathleen Stiffler vs Amy Hutchinson / Anne Genske6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesHolly Reiter / Angela Jakeway vs Kathy Weitzel / Suzanne Suttles6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJoanne Empey Rodriguez / Jeri Ames vs Margaret Arnot / Cathy Leitch6-2, 6-4
2022-03-11vs LKKaake/Holbrook 30Split 11
W#1 DoublesMeagan Palmer / Kathleen Stiffler vs Karen Cooper / Ilieva Ageenko6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAnna Sanders / Joanne Empey Rodriguez vs Patty Howe / Gail Quinlan1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-03-04Won 10
W#3 DoublesAngela Jakeway / Connie Mathis vs Margaret Arnot / Cathy Leitch6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Ann Murphy
published 3.5
3.35
Brenda Clay
published 3.5
3.00
Barbara Bischoff
published 3.5
3.00
Kathleen Stiffler
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.84
Angela Jakeway
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.81
Shirley Pirkl
published
2.77
Holly Reiter
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.71
Beth McClay
published 3
2.70
Zahra Simonetti
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.51
Joanne Empey Rodriguez
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.14
Connie Mathis
published 2.5
Sandra Stinson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Zahra Simonetti + Angela Jakeway181749% games+9.1% vs expected
Holly Reiter + Zahra Simonetti134 matchesnot enough data
Holly Reiter + Angela Jakeway314 matchesnot enough data
Angela Jakeway + Kathleen Stiffler224 matchesnot enough data
Ann Murphy + Kathleen Stiffler123 matchesnot enough data
Zahra Simonetti + Kathleen Stiffler213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ann Murphy
13W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Brenda Clay
40W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
Barbara Bischoff
0W–6L career · type S · no lines in 2022
49%51%<1%
3.00
3.5
Kathleen Stiffler
152W–161L career · 3 lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
3.00
3
Angela Jakeway
71W–69L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
2.84
Shirley Pirkl
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
2.81
3
Holly Reiter
35W–39L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Beth McClay
2W–10L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
2.71
3
Zahra Simonetti
140W–173L career · 3 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Joanne Empey Rodriguez
31W–61L career · 3 lines in 2022
46%54%<1%
2.51
2.5
Connie Mathis
5W–0L career · no lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.14
Sandra Stinson
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.