Teams

LKKaake/Holbrook 30

2022 Lake USTA 55 & Over League · Women 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-04-22vs LHRE-REITER/WESTPORTSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKaren Cooper / Melinda Little vs Angela Jakeway / Zahra Simonetti3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKathleen Kaake / Denise Takes vs Anna Sanders / Sandra Stinson2-6, 4-6
2022-04-08Won 10
W#2 DoublesKathleen Kaake / Sherry Hunstad vs Cathy Leitch / Anne Genske6-3, 6-2
2022-04-01vs LHRE-REITER/WESTPORTWon 10
W#3 DoublesKaren Burr / Melinda Little vs Connie Mathis / Angela Jakeway6-3, 6-4
2022-03-18Won 30
W#1 DoublesDenise Takes / Kathleen Kaake vs Kristi Moody / Elizabeth Davis6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSherry Hunstad / Gail Quinlan vs Suzanne Suttles / Kathy Weitzel7-6, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMelinda Little / Karen Burr vs Mary Lavoie / Pam Cossar4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2022-03-05Split 11
W#2 DoublesCindy Long / Sherry Hunstad vs Anne Genske / Mary Lavoie6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDenise Takes / Kay James vs Kathy Weitzel / Ellen Brown2-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Jennifer Ashford
published
2.85
Kathleen Kaake
published
2.82
Denise Takes
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
Ilieva Ageenko
published 3
2.73
Melinda Little
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.72
Maureen Swink
published
2.69
Patty Howe
published
2.64
Beth Welch
published 3
2.59
Kay James
published
2.57
Gail Quinlan
published 3
2.55
Karen Cooper
published
2.51
Sherry Hunstad
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sherry Hunstad + Melinda Little314 matchesnot enough data
Patty Howe + Sherry Hunstad123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Ashford
8W–13L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
Kathleen Kaake
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
88%12%<1%
2.85
3
Denise Takes
125W–152L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Ilieva Ageenko
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Melinda Little
42W–48L career · 3 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
Maureen Swink
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.72
Patty Howe
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Beth Welch
8W–16L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
2.64
Kay James
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
23%76%<1%
2.59
3
Gail Quinlan
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
28%71%<1%
2.57
Karen Cooper
2W–8L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
2.55
3
Sherry Hunstad
28W–54L career · 3 lines in 2022
46%54%<1%
2.51

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.